Thursday, March 10, 2011

But a shot in the dark, one step away from you... (61, 62, 63)

Current: Day 4 and no RJ or spam. Did he get picked up for something? Disillusioned? Dropped out? Kicked out?

I have two suspicious posts here, but still not the typical spam.

Dems and GOP can be OUTLAWED! (People's Republic of NC)


Date: 2011-03-09, 1:23PM EST
Reply to: comm-3vunh-2256097788@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


do YOU PEOPLE realize that the TWO MOST EVIL FORCES that control us are democrats and republicans?

WHY must WE the PEOPLE continue to ALLOW these criminals to run our lives?
They are NOT Constitutionally REQUIRED, therefore...

WE the PEOPLE should collectively call for the statewide ban on the NC democrat party and the NC GOP...

Once we BAN them in OUR state, watch how this catches on nationally! REMOVE their sorry asses from practice NOW!!!

  • Location: People's Republic of NC
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests




PostingID: 2256097788

the TWO MOST EVIL FORCES that control us are democrats and republicans (Uncle Sam’s Ponzi scheme will stop.)


Date: 2011-03-09, 2:42PM EST
Reply to: comm-zqgrw-2256282089@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


Yes, it has been obvious for quite some time.
Read:
U.S. Is Bankrupt and We Don’t Even Know It: Laurence Kotlikoff
" . . . the IMF has effectively pronounced the U.S. bankrupt. Section 6 of the July 2010 Selected Issues Paper says: “The U.S. fiscal gap associated with today’s federal fiscal policy is huge for plausible discount rates.” It adds that “closing the fiscal gap requires a permanent annual fiscal adjustment equal to about 14 percent of U.S. GDP.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-11/u-s-is-bankrupt-and-we-don-t-even-know-commentary-by-laurence-kotlikoff.html

  • Location: Uncle Sam’s Ponzi scheme will stop.
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests




PostingID: 2256282089
------
Back to the regularly scheduled program...
--------

A curve ball of a post. Can you tell what I was caught up on? (use of anonymized email, no capitalization mistakes). Come to think of it, this is probably a LB Pork production, considering that he used that same review of the Red Amendment in the comment section of my blog not too long ago.

2218197972   Feb 16 11 01:21:12 PM   bos   politics   Why we call him lumpy.

X2 RE; Whiny mintainer can't tell us why he Maintains Fraud (Incompetent,)
Date: 2011-02-16, 2:22PM EST
Reply to: comm-fmyac-2217944171@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]

To the one presumed to be an attorney who is obviously a bad one as he has too much time to spend on Craig's List posting hate messages...


Using "Lumpy" is name calling = Childish


Using the word "Scam" in relation to Bork is unsubstantiated = Incompetent, not to mention defamation.


The fact is, you are against freedom of speech, of which you incompetently refer to as "Spam".

You are the "Guy afraid of educational information" and a "Maintainer". So you do not confuse that with name calling, again the definition for that is: Maintainers. Individuals and organizations of numerous kinds that use various methods to maintain control of America through the 14th Amendment political and legal system. Such entities are generally benefactors of what the system produces, hence have a pecuniary (profit) interest as motivation. See Gate Keeper, and Lapdog

As far as Bork's book, here is one of the latest reviews I have found:


After careful review and consideration of "The Red Amendment" it is my privilege and pleasure to endorse and offer high praise to this most exceptional scholarly work. If I were pressed to define the book in a few words it would be as "a treatise on the subject matter of regaining your God given rights and in the shortest amount of space". Mr. Bork's dissertation expertly assists the Freedom Lover from Alpha to Omega without any of the pain or guess work usually associated with the classical mistakes made in the freedom movement (claiming the political status of Sovereign while strapped with the balls & chains of the 14th). The Red Amendment is not to be mistaken as a linear or singular dissertation for tax tyranny avoidance. This book is powerful, timeless and provides essential hidden knowledge that when employed will liberate the masses.


If you are not inclined to live as a Slave on his knee and shackled with "relative privileges", ruled in a ruthless fashion by a Nation of Men (The Legislator)... read this book.


If you are inclined to possess the Natural Rights and the very essence of freedom enjoyed by our self governing Founding Fathers ... read this book!


I began the study of Constitutional Law in 1994 and can state without reservation, there no better source than "The Red Amendment" for comprehensive study on this most important subject matter.


Respectfully Submitted,


Michael Davis, Illinois


http://www.redamendment.net/home/
-----------------------------
I'm not a lawyer. I'm just another internet asshole that loves to troll scam artists in my spare time. Lumpy, here, is my favorite target. Most of the time when I make fun of him or even point out flaws in his argument, I get a "Maintainer and Deceiver" type robotic response. But as I delve deeper and deeper into his responses and various legal theories, I find something so critical, so embarrassing, that when I call him out on it, he breaks down with a human response. You see, my purpose isn't to win the debate, my purpose is to know why he feels this way. Did he really have a bad run in with a "lesbian lawyer from Somerville", or is that a rouse? Is he pushing these legal theories because he's emotionally hurt over paying child support, and he doesn't want to anymore? Who knows...

I once called Lumpy racist because he espouses Judge LH Perez's opposition toward the 14th Amendment, and he completely backpedaled saying that he's not racist (in his own spiritually childish words) only to spam the board some more. I expected three things out of him:
1) To reconcile every horrible thing that Judge LH Perez, and
2) Explain if LH Perez is against the income tax as well, not just black people, and
3) Explain how Judge LH Perez is right this time regarding the 14th Amendment considering he is absolutely wrong in everything else. Remember, were talking about a man who organized violent white mobs into destroying schools and school boards and assaulting black people, suspended legislature, stuffed ballot boxes, intimidated black voters, etc. He was even EXCOMMUNICATED by the Catholic Church and it didn't even put a damper in his unlawful activities. (Hardly the paragon of law and morality that Lumpy wants him to be).

The other thing that I have a hard time reconciling is that Lumpy is against the 14th Amendment because it creates some whackadoodle legal system (read: doesn't want to pay income tax) and it should be abolished, yet he promotes the PACINLAW scam where it doesn't even matter if 14th Amendment is illegal, because LB Bork found a way out of the Federal System by renouncing Federal citizenship (through him at $450 per person and $350 per year membership, plus $30 per book per person, not including any other membership fees, all paid with BLANK MONEY ORDERS). Keep in mind, LB Bork proclaimed that the 14th Amendment created this dual citizenship and that anyone can opt out, so why is he against the 14th Amendment if it doesn't matter? It sounds like he should be FOR it because it gives him a steady job and a steady stream of income "helping" people opt out.

LB Bork seriously has nothing to gain if the 14th Amendment were to be abolished. You shouldn't be fucking it up for him - he's got bills that don't pay themselves.

Remember, your freedom of speech is limited by Craig's rules. You're only really allowed to post once every 48hrs. Everything else is up to community standards. We allow a discussion, but not spam, and certainly not scams.

Finally, it's perfectly fair to call someone names and other ad hominem attacks if the other side is completely uninterested in debate. It's the internet for Christ sakes, grow a pair! We gave Lumpy plenty of time to answer each and every question asked, but he did not bother. Instead, he continued to spam like there's a sucker born every minute. Hell, he even dragged your stupid ass to defend him, assuming that you're not one of his sockpuppets that forgot to uncheck the "use anonymous email" button. Which is another thing that kills me because I could be arguing with him email to email instead of counter posting on an already shitted up classified section if he provides the anonymous email.


In short, fuck you, Lumpy! Hello, new name to Google.

-Lesbian Lawyer #666
Every time I read that review, I laugh.
After careful review and consideration of "The Red Amendment" it is my privilege and pleasure to endorse and offer high praise to this most exceptional scholarly work. If I were pressed to define the book in a few words it would be as "a treatise on the subject matter of regaining your God given rights and in the shortest amount of space". Mr. Bork's dissertation expertly assists the Freedom Lover from Alpha to Omega without any of the pain or guess work usually associated with the classical mistakes made in the freedom movement (claiming the political status of Sovereign while strapped with the balls & chains of the 14th). The Red Amendment is not to be mistaken as a linear or singular dissertation for tax tyranny avoidance. This book is powerful, timeless and provides essential hidden knowledge that when employed will liberate the masses.

If you are not inclined to live as a Slave on his knee and shackled with "relative privileges", ruled in a ruthless fashion by a Nation of Men (The Legislator)... read this book.


If you are inclined to possess the Natural Rights and the very essence of freedom enjoyed by our self governing Founding Fathers ... read this book!


I began the study of Constitutional Law in 1994 and can state without reservation, there no better source than "The Red Amendment" for comprehensive study on this most important subject matter.

Well, it's painless for the first few years. Ultimately, the IRS will catch up to people who don't pay their taxes. Usually, Sovereign Citizen (or "freedom movement") types send bogus returns, liens, documents, threats, and lawsuits to the IRS, and that almost always results in immediate IRS action. That's the classical mistake that Michael Davis is referring to in the review. What makes PACINLAW different on their approach to "freedom" is that they don't deal with the government at all. It's all an illusion, they take your money, they give you fake paperwork and a worthless membership, and they don't put any faith behind their service. LB alludes that one could be free from the IRS, but ultimately his service does nothing.

Maybe I'm asking too much out of LB Bork, but I wouldn't be surprised if the worthless membership dues created a separate extralegal court system, like other sovereign citizen groups do. This leaves me with this nagging thought - I wonder what happens when someone doesn't pay their 2nd or 3rd year membership dues... Obviously, that someone is out of the club, but what about their State National status, despite it's worthlessness.

The kicker is at the very end. I began the study of Constitutional Law in 1994... Where? Fringe websites? 

Here's another annoying piece of spam I attribute to RJ, even though it's not specific to his theme. It's always nested in a series of pacinlaw spam posts. I shrunk the font because of RAND PAUL.

2218300583   Feb 16 11 02:12:23 PM   bos   politics   OH NO not my Wingmaster!!!
Wow, Rand Paul's writing is worse than his debating. Who knew?
OK, I have a few protips:

Protip 1: Nobody gives a shit about your hunting gun. You can put it back on the rack of your pickup truck.
Protip 2: The treaty is about going after international arms dealers, or often referred to as "dealers of death" - people who sell automatic weapons to whomever they wish, including blood thirsty dictators and terrorists. And you don't support dictators and terrorists, now do you?
Protip 3: If your understanding of arms treaties is that poor, maybe we should take whatever weapons you do have because you're definitely too stupid to separate reality from fiction, therefore too stupid to be allowed to operate a firearm.

I swear, it's people like you that give gun owners like me a bad name.

Hope this helps!!!!!

------------------
Dear fellow Patriot,

Gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced the Obama Administration will be working hand-in-glove with the UN to pass a new "Small Arms Treaty."
Disguised as an "International Arms Control Treaty" to fight against "terrorism," "insurgency" and "international crime syndicates," the UN's Small Arms Treaty is in fact a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.
I'm helping lead the fight to defeat this radical treaty in the United States Senate and I want your help.
Please join me by taking a public stand against this outright assault on our national sovereignty by signing the Official Firearms Sovereignty Survey.
Ultimately, the UN's Small Arms Treaty is designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.
http://www.nagr.org/UN_RP_Survey1.aspx?pid=pl4
So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.
But looking at previous versions of the UN Small Arms Treaty, you and I can get a good idea of what's likely in the works.

If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the UN "Small Arms Treaty" would almost certainly FORCE the U.S. to:
*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding Americans cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;
*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL "unauthorized" civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);
*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;
*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.

I'm sure I don't have to tell you that this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.
Ever since its founding 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.
To the petty dictators and one-world socialists who control the UN, the United States of America isn't a "shining city on a hill" -- it's an affront to their grand designs for the globe.

http://www.nagr.org/UN_RP_Survey1.aspx?pid=pl4

These anti-gun globalists know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they'll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide power they crave.
And the UN's apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.
That's why I was so glad to hear that the National Association for Gun Rights is leading the fight to stop this assault on our Constitution!

The truth is there's no time to waste.
You and I have to be prepared for this fight to move FAST.
The fact is the last thing the gun-grabbers at the UN and in Washington, D.C. want is for you and me to have time to mobilize gun owners to defeat this radical legislation.
They've made that mistake before, and we've made them pay, defeating EVERY attempt to ram the "Treaty on Small Arms" into law since the mid-1990s.
But now time may not be on our side.
In fact, we're likely to only have a few weeks to defeat the treaty when they make their move.
And we definitely don't have a President in the White House who will oppose this treaty.
So our ONE AND ONLY CHANCE to stop the UN's "Small Arms Treaty" is during the ratification process in the U.S. Senate.
As you know, it takes 67 Senate votes to ratify a treaty.
With new pro-gun champions joining me in the Senate, rounding up enough votes to kill this thing should be easy, right?
Unfortunately, that couldn't be further from the truth.
Even with the Republican tidal wave in November, there still isn't a pro-gun majority in the Senate to kill ratification of the treaty.
You know just as well as I do how few Senators are truly "pro-gun."
Not only that, but many Senators get "queasy" about killing treaties for fear of "embarrassing" the President -- especially with "international prestige" at stake.
They look at ratifying treaties much like approving the President's Supreme Court nominees.
Remember how many Senators turned their back on us and voted to confirm anti-gun Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor?
A dozen more only voted against Sotomayor after receiving massive grassroots pressure from the folks back home.
So if we're going to defeat the UN's Small Arms Treaty we have to turn the heat up on the U.S. Senate now before it's too late!
Do you believe the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment are the supreme law of the land?
Do you believe any attempt by the United Nations to subvert or supersede your Constitutional rights must be opposed?
If you said "Yes" to these questions, please sign the survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you.

Your survey will put you squarely on the record AGAINST the UN's Small Arms Treaty.
And along with your signed survey, I hope you'll send a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35 to help finance this battle.
With your generous contribution, the National Association for Gun Rights will continue contacting Second Amendment supporters to turn up the heat on targeted U.S. Senators.
Not only that, but they're preparing a massive program to launch the second this treaty is brought before the Senate.
Direct mail. Phones. Email. Blogs. Guest editorials. Press conferences. Hard-hitting internet, newspaper, radio and even TV ads if funding permits. The whole nine yards.
Of course, a program of this scale is only possible if the National Association for Gun Rights can raise the money.
But that's not easy, and we may not have much time.
In fact, if gun owners are going to defeat the UN's Small Arms Treaty pro-gun Americans like you and me have to get involved NOW!
So please put yourself on record AGAINST the UN's Small Arms Treaty by signing NAGR's Firearms Sovereignty Survey.
But along with your survey, please agree to make a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35.
And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.
Thank you in advance for your time and money devoted to defending our Second Amendment rights.

For Freedom,

Rand Paul
United States Senator

P.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has announced the Obama Administration will be working hand in glove with the United Nations to pass a new GLOBAL, "Small Arms Treaty."
If we're going to defeat the UN's Small Arms Treaty we have to turn the heat up on the U.S. Senate now before it's too late!
Please return your Firearms Sovereignty Survey and put yourself squarely on the record AGAINST ratification of the UN's Small Arms Treaty.
And if you can, please make a generous contribution to the National Association for Gun Rights of $250, $150, $100 or even just $35 right away!
And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.
http://www.nagr.org/UN_RP_Survey1.aspx?pid=pl4
The bombshell. (I half expected this, but to get it in writing makes it that much sweeter).
I should have added next to liberty dollars: BLANK MONEY ORDERS.


2222321904   Feb 18 11 05:53:15 PM    bos   politics   re2: Fair and Balanced Reporting

Well, that explains it all. I always thought you were getting paid to do this. What kind of money are you making out of this? Is it in a gimmick currency? (liberty dollars?)
_________________________________
I have Only Lately began to Flag Posting of Liberals. My Posting have been flagged consistantly for the last year. I have NO problem Posting 50 or more a day if my Postings become Flagged. I now have that program that will delete Craig list Postings within seconds. I wish Not to use it. My intent was never to post more than a few a day, unless my postings become deleted. I am lucky to be working for a True Patriot who allows me to work on CL while I'm working and has No Problem Paying me all day to do so!! Flagging goes both ways. As does opposing post of opinions. How do you wish to handle this? What say you.

http://www.notmygovernment.us/forum/NMG.pl?num=1298064764

http://www.notmygovernment.us/forum/NMG.pl?num=1283125417
___________________________________________________
I am guilty of flagging RTR News. This is because yesterday the BorkBot called for the flagging of all LIB POSTS. And he proceeded to follow through.

Earlier today, there was a post with a list of leftwing news articles. Here's the link: http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/pol/2221415348.html

Yep, it was flagged and deleted. Then the Rightwing News post appeared.

Now, I can appreciate seeing the conservative point of view here. Lefties like discussing rightwing beliefs. But if leftie news is to be flagged, and rightwing news isn't flagged, I'd say that's not fair or balanced.

BORKBOT: If flagging liberal posts is your new game, it will fail, and you will attract even more flags to your posts.
_______________________
Flaggers! (from another spam flagger)
Date: 2011-02-18, 5:39PM EST

I have stopped flagging the Pacinlaw spams when the guy only posts a few of them. Even the "RTR News" post, which links to false "news" sources like Newsmax and WND, is still a valid post!

The spammer will learn not to spam and double-post if you avoid flagging him on days when he does NOT overpost.

Just a request for fair and balanced flagging!

signed,
the REAL Lizzy Leftwinger

* it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2222257076

Since then, most of my posts have been flagged.

No comments:

Post a Comment