Sunday, September 23, 2012

Smug Activist update

Wow, my Smug Activist post generated more interest than my blog itself!

If you want to know more about the Smug Activist, here's a Quatloos thread on him. It features everything you could possibly want to know, even though the video is almost self explanatory.

  • Name: Robert Peterson
  • Age: 21
  • Place: A courthouse in Kootenai, Idaho
  • Reason: To contest a ticket - riding with no lights on a bicycle at night.
  • End result: 3 charges of battery, 1 contempt of court
Had Robert put away his camera as required, he wouldn't be in jail.

Had Robert respected the Bailiffs (P. Barnes, et al.), he wouldn't be in jail.
Had Robert studied the rules of the courtroom, maybe even hiring a court reporter, he wouldn't be in jail.
Had Robert used a hidden camera instead, he probably wouldn't be in jail. (don't do this!)

And, of course, had Robert paid his "damnit, they got me dead-to-rights" ticket, he wouldn't be in jail either, and there wouldn't be an embarrassing viral video on the internet. However, now that I think of it, Robert was probably bound to serve jail time over contempt charges if he tried to use his crazy theories, it's almost a moot point. With all of this said, I can't wait until Tosh.0 interviews him.

The speculation so far is that his mother is also a sovereign citizen, and he learned it from his mother/father from an early age. I don't buy it (yet).

I still feel strongly about the tasering. However, the reality is that everyone who had the ball dropped it, and I really can't fault bailiff P. Barnes. Here's how I think things should have happened at every step:

  1. Security should have recognized the trouble before granting admission, present a clear ultimatum, either lose the camera entirely (by giving it up to security, or putting it back in the car) and come in, or stay out. No in-betweens. 
  2. Get tossed out at first instance of video camera use.
  3. Get tossed out at escalation of encounter. 
  4. Get tossed out at any point after he left the court room.
  5. Get tossed out after altercation with Bailiffs.
(steps 2-5 must lead to seizure of camera, or him being forced to put camera back in his car or wherever. No arrest to be made - Robert isn't dangerously belligerent. Just plain old belligerent. Had there been another push to get through, then arrest Robert with assault.) 

To me, all possible remedies must be explored before taser work, and that means physical work like restraining and removal. Tasers are a "less lethal" remedy, and have the potential to kill or seriously harm the assailant. Just think: if he's sovereign, he probably doesn't have insurance either. Why risk dumping this man on the nearest overstuffed hospital? Why risk opening the town up to the craziest goddamn lawsuit ever conceived?

This is where I really diverge with the Quatloos people. I refuse to have an ultra conservative viewpoint regarding law and order (or anything else, really). There's so much we don't know about Robert Peterson. Just how much of a role does his family play into this incident? Is he schizophrenic or bipolar? A whole lot of Youtube and Ron Paul? The point being, he isn't Old Yeller waiting to be put down. He can be rehabilitated into a productive member of society. We shouldn't be so blood thirsty.

This isn't the only time I have felt this way about Quatloos. It took me full year to get worn down by it.

Hell, I wish I started with a more caring approach with my blog. I believe the internet calls this troller's remorse.

Unless something big happens regarding LB Bork or PACinLaw, I will not go there.

-----
There's a new infection of PACinLaw posts on Craigslist. I still collect them, and there will be a post about it soon. 

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

"Smug Activist Cameraman tazed in the court house"

I caught this video while perusing the Something Awful forums, and I felt that it would be a disservice if I didn't post the video here. This is the short version, (and the best if you're in a hurry):


Here's the long version:



Here's a helpful Youtube comment (however, be sure to take it with a grain of salt).
seljakizgruda 4 hours ago 1st name Robert, last Peterson from North Idaho. Peterson believes he is exempt from laws, and rules unless he's hurt or wronged someone else.Peterson is in jail under $50,000 dollars bond.
He faces three counts of battery against a peace officer and one count of criminal contempt.
AWESOME
For the record: I do not support police brutality, or excessive force such as this act of tasering. I don't think that cop was right to do what he did, and I don't think that Robert was anywhere near the threshold that triggers the use of a taser. 

-----

With all of this put aside, I have to admit that these two videos are very funny, and to listen to "sovereign speak" from someone who sincerely believes in what he's saying, is just simply unbelievable. I wonder if Robert watches his own videos and realizes just how stupid he is. 

Note the similarities between Robert's convictions to Redemption style sovereign citizen: He's a "man", not a person, the person is a legal entity that he shedded somehow, and he as a "man" is not within current jurisdiction. Also make note of the similarities with PACinlaw style sovereign citizen: He's a state citizen, not a federal citizen (which he also somehow shedded), has state ID, but believes the state is under military control ("admiralty maritime jurisdiction"), as evidenced by gold tassels on an American flag in the courtroom (LB Bork actually believes a variation of this, except as "false government control" instead of "military control"). 

It's like two incest love children having their own incestuous lovechild and decided not to abort. That said, I can't wait until the sovereign citizen movement aborts itself.

In the long version, Robert appears to be too young for the sovereign citizen scene. Perhaps he was a former Paulite that clicked on some sovereign stuff one day and said "Man, this is an eyeopener! I can't wait to not file my 1040!" And if I have to give any credit, he is confident and persistent. Great journalism requires big balls like that. It's too bad he's a moron. I have to commend the police for putting up with this for as long as they did. If I were a cop, I would have two hand grabbed Robert and tossed him out the door. No punches, no tasers. You know, good old fashioned security work. Hell, Patrick Swayze wouldn't use no taser and he's too pretty to be a bouncer.

Despite the wrongful tasering, I admire the cop who administered it. He really reminded me of wserra and others on the Quatloos forums. They didn't foolishly research and deconstruct LB Bork's material like I did. They saw the immediate flaws and shut that bullshit down for what it was, leaving Bork with his tail between his legs, full of butthurt. 

Robert: Well, I don't have to go in...
Pete:     OK
Robert: because you can't even issue a warrant for me
Pete:     Then you might as well leave.
Robert: Well, no, I'm a gonna go in there and speak with a prosecutor
Pete:     You can go in without the camera.
Robert: *looks around* please step aside, I'm going in.

What a dumbass. How hard is it to get a spy camera anyway? Why make a scene? Did he honestly think other people were judging him so much that he had to go for broke to prove a point? The more I think about it, the more I believe he's an impulsive 18 year old.  



Well, as a parting quote, I'll leave you with this:
"It's not like I haven't been tased before..."

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Craigslist activity < July 1st (part 1)

My laissez faire approach netted me so many posts that I had to break this update it up into parts. Enjoy.

--------------

This, here, is a unique post. Yeah, I can't believe it either, and I went through my entire blog looking to see if I covered it. It feels so old! (or as Pepsi would say "new look, same great flavor")


District and Municipal Courts are Legislative Courts (STUPID PEOPLE For NOT KNOWING)



Date: 2012-05-24, 6:36PM EDT
Reply to: t5jft-3036232212@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]



District and municipal courts are legislative courts, not judicial courts. They have almost unlimited power and this is not good. The people are coerced into unconscionable dominion by them. Most people don't understand what is happening to them and think that it must be fair and impartial, but it is pure enslavement. The legislature has made courts (district and municipal) and given them power. They are legislative courts as defined in law dictionaries. Their power comes not from the judiciary, but from the legislature, and hence have no judicial power, but are administrative.


This is entirely contrary to and violates the separation of powers doctrine. Thus they are without the law, and can do almost anything they desire, since they do not answer to the justice system. This also explains why the superior courts are reluctant to overrule them. They literally are a law unto themselves, which explains why they have no compulsion to rule against any and all constitutional mandates.


Because the people have allowed this take place, they have increased in their power, domination, and unlawfulness. The strong bar union has sold justice to the game of give and take, for the benefit of the bar. The law has become the law of necessity, which is anarchy in government




http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread836073/pg1
  • Location: STUPID PEOPLE For NOT KNOWING
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 3036232212

Ok, so we have a sophist style argument, with Above Top Secret as a source. *puts latex gloves on* Clicking on the link brings you to a series of postings by drmeola (who also posts on the Not My Government forums), with the intent to educate the reader on the Constitution. His argument is structured on period correct (pre-Civil War) legal dictionaries and other Sovereign Citizen sources. No thanks, bro. However, a fellow anti-14th Amendment forum member throws logic at drmeola, so there's some schadenfreude to be enjoyed here.



Here's a new Communist Manifesto post. I wonder how RJ keeps track of his spam.
Communist Manifesto

Date: 2012-05-24, 6:38PM EDT
Reply to: 7bspk-3036235083@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]

These are all contracts you are party to:


1. Social Security contract
2. Automobile Registration contract [acting as a surety, by threat and/or duress ]
... 3. Automobile State Inspection contract [acting as a surety, by threat and/or duress ]
4. Automobile Insurance contract [acting as a surety, by threat and/or duress ]
5. Driver License contract [acting as a surety, by threat and/or duress ]
6. Passport contract [acting as a surety, by threat and/or duress ]
7. Mortgage Loan contract
8. Title Insurance contract (to insure title to the house)
9. Survey contract (on the house you are buying)
10. Homeowner's Insurance contract
11. Private Mortgage Insurance contract
12. Property tax contract in the Deed of Trust [i.e., adhesion contract]
13. IRS Tax Return contract [acting as a surety, by threat and/or duress]
14. W-4 Withholding contract [acting as a surety, by threat and/or duress]
15. Employment contract
16. Medical Insurance contract
17. Life Insurance contract
18. Disability Insurance contract
19. Marriage contract
20. Birth Certificate contract
21. Contract with the COUNTY CLERK to file your documents (involves trust)
22. Trust agreements/contracts
23. Bank account contracts and credit card contracts
24. Bankruptcy contract by the fiction
25. Alleged contracts involving benefits, i.e., unemployment, disability, etc. -- (There is no such thing as a government benefit. That is simply propaganda that has been stuffed down our throats for years, and we have accepted it as being true. The truth is, government doesn't have any money with which to pay any benefits. Any funds that the government has, come from the people. Any alleged "benefits" received from the government are our funds that we paid in, in the form of taxes. The created cannot give a benefit to the creator, nor is the creator subject to the created.)
26. Order Contracts/End user license agreements (cd, dvd, software purchases)


the list goes on!
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 3036235083
Fucking society! I wanna do what I want to whomever I want! 

Side thought: I find # 25 quite funny. What a shallow understanding of insurance, and all-around dumb thing to say.



This one comes from deep within RJ's psyche:

Domestic Violence - The Duluth Model - part 1 of 2 (New World Order plan using FEMINISM)


Date: 2012-06-04, 10:07PM EDT
Reply to: z8fhw-3057945246@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


This is why Family Courts have created triple the amount of 'single mother households' since 1990. That is the New World Order plan using FEMINISM to achieve their ends. This is their "logic".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gg80cJnqQyU&feature=share

You are strongly encouraged to copy this video and upload it to your own channel. This is a copy. To find the original video please visit manager's chan...

  • Location: New World Order plan using FEMINISM
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 3057945246

Yes, because if family courts caused this problem of "single mother households." It's never the husband's fault, is it RJ? Let me guess, if family courts never existed everyone's marriage could not fail.

Anyway, I watched the Youtube video. As soon as a picture of Margaret Thatcher popped up, I thought I was going to see some Grade A crazy. Turns out that the documentary is boring, and I stopped it 5 minutes in. One could be better served by googling The Duluth Model instead of watching that dreck.




This post marks the full return of PACINLAW to bos/pol. You've seen it before.

FAILURES OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS (PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER )
Date: 2012-06-06, 4:00PM EDT
Reply to: 89qzg-3061509489@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/The_Intelligent_Student.php

To demonstrate how NWO sociological, economic and religious goals are being brought about we can look first at the public schools. Most students and parents think the purpose of public schools is to teach essential and interesting information, vocational and recreational skills, considerate and responsible behavior and an appreciation of our country¹s history and Constitution. After your formal education is over, your parents expect that you should be able to take responsibility for your own moral, material, and social well-being, and also the moral, material, and social well-being of any children you might have until they, too, are ready to claim such freedom for themselves.

At one time the goal of those who planned the school curriculum in the local communities seemed to follow the wishes of parents and the needs of students. Now, however, those sociologists who have the power to affect policy in the public schools do not concern themselves with what you need, what your parents want for you, or with respect and support for the United States Constitution. Their primary goals are to CONSOLIDATE policies, COMMERCIALIZE instruction, CLASSIFY individuals, CLAIM jurisdiction, establish CONTROL, and train you to fit obediently into their world management system without hesitation or protest. In 1928, sociologist Ross L. Finney wrote:

"A new world is emerging in which the social structures will be of a different shape, the social resources of a different scope and caliber, than anything that history records. It is a new deal - in fact a different game with different cards; and we who are now alive are privileged to witness its beginning, however blind most of us may be to its implications for ourselves and our posterity. And for a new age, a new school!" 4



FAILURES OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS

In recent decades, public education has been subjected to a great deal of criticism. Because schools and curriculum have been interfered with by those who promote the NWO world management system, students were not learning what their parents, potential employers, and the students themselves, knew they ought to learn. Skill in reading, natural science, English, mathematics, foreign languages were dismally lacking in many high schools, and even college graduates. All kinds of excuses have been brought forward such as:

• The problem is with your parents because they do not take an interest in your schooling

• The problem is with you and other students because you do not work hard enough or take an interest in learning

• The schools are not using the right system of teaching. We need to experiment with new systems

• The problem is not enough money for education. If schools had more money they would produce better results

• The problem is segregation. We need to bus for integration

• Classrooms are overcrowded. We need more teachers

• Public schools should have tax-supported competition. We need charter schools and school vouchers

And so it has gone for decades.



http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/The_Intelligent_Student.php

state National http://www.statenationals.net/home.php

State National http://www.statenationals.net/promo/

http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/Treason_by_Design.php

http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/Agent_Provocateur.php

http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/Who_Is_Your_Mommy.php

http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/Historical_Error.php

http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/Census_Farce_2010.php

http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/Straw_Man.php

http://www.notmygovernment.us/forum/NMG.pl?num=1269789983

http://www.pacinlaw.org/system/win_ins.php?http://www.pacinlaw.org/red/

http://www.pacinlaw.org/system/win_ins.php?http://www.pacinlaw.org/fourteenth/

http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/sup/Senate_Resolution_62.php

http://www.pacinlaw.org/system/win_ins.php?http://www.pacinlaw.org/members/mo.php

http://www.pacinlaw.org/promo/

http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/Nationality_Premise.pdf


  • Location: PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 3061509489

I'm still on the fence on doing a content audit of this article. It's NWO boilerplate material, and LB Bork didn't write it (though he sure didn't mind hijacking it for his own purposes). However, the bullet point "The problem is segregation. We need to bus for integration", listed as an excuse for bad education, still bothers me. It simply stinks of dog whistle racism of the 60's and 70's.

I did a little internet detective work on Erica Carle, the author of the above post, and she seems paranoid enough to be worth critiquing. Maybe she's one of the "teachers" that LB Bork referred to at the end of Historical Error...

------------


After this piece, bos/pol went down the shitter. Stay tuned for more.

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Surprise Guest (it's Bork!!! *party-favor*)

It's good to see Jimmy Two Times weigh in on my last two posts. You know, if there was one thing that I really missed, it was the warmth. I mean, he really brought his A-game; I don't know if I can compete with that. It's like he figured out the Wu-Tang Secret and obtained the coveted "nothin' to fuck wit'" status (I'm such a hater because of this!!!).

If the intended effect was to want me to continue blogging, then congrats. I really wanted to quit and just let this blog float out onto the open sea forever. But nope, Bork must really want me to keep sloggin'. I have noticed that RJ has gone back to posting PACINLAW material - I guess I can write about that...

I don't really have to, though. I could sit on my ass and still be 5th place on Google - and ultimately, that must really hurt.

Sweet dreams.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

A post for 2012

It's hard staying motivated when nothing drives me. LB Bork's forums are far too slow for me, and RJ disappeared off of Craigslist for a good chunk of winter. Because of this, I literally ran out of things that I could talk about easily, things I only have time for anymore.

Lately I have noticed an increase in racist posts in the bos /pol section. I responded to one of the posts in a sarcastic manner but it was completely lost on the original poster. Likewise, I have also seen a rise in "judicial male bias" type posts, which seems like something that RJ would post.

Here's a common judicial male bias post that I attribute to RJ, mainly because this is the first result for false restraining orders and it fits his profile.

males over 13 years old (USA)


Date: 2012-03-26, 8:17AM EDT
Reply to: xc5kf-2915702327@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


Every man and boy be afraid be very afraid. Learn how our system will
destroy your life and you will have no way to protect yourself.
For more info google "False restraining orders" before its too late.
Educate yourself!!


  • Location: USA
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests




PostingID: 2915702327

There were quite a few of these. The old me would have went out of my way to flag these posts. Now, I just roll my eyes and move on. I just don't have the energy to flag this.

Then this post popped up. This is the first time I have seen an anti-14th Amendment post since the new year. With that in mind, I don't ever remember seeing it. Man, it's great having a fresh set of eyes!

U.S.A. The Republic, Is The House That No One Lives In (Except the Few!!)


Date: 2012-03-30, 9:22AM EDT
Reply to: xspxx-2930460435@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


U.S.A. The Republic, Is The House That No One Lives In

"On July 27, 1868, one day before the 14th Amendment took effect, an "Act" of Congress was passed. This Act was 15 United States Statute at Large, known as the "Expatriation Statute." Though this Statute is no longer included in the United... States Code, it has not been repealed and is still in effect. This Statute is extremely important because it is the public municipal law the individual can use for private purposes to remove him/herself from the private trust law operating in the public sector. That is, a private individual, who has found himself or herself bound by private law that is being used in the public sector to promote public policy of compelled performance which he did not have a choice in, can access the public positive statute law to move back under the liberty and protection of the Republic and its separation of powers.

The preamble of 15 United States Statute at Large is unique in that Congress laid the legal discussions to rest before the Statute took effect to assure it would not be tampered with legally in any way. It stands as written and is there for the citizens to use as Public Law for the private purpose of moving themselves from one political or territorial jurisdiction to another. This means there is a way out at anytime of any United States government policy or law, including those of its political subdivisions, that is based on private law. Whenever you find yourself bound by any compelled performance you had no choice in, you are operating in the jurisdiction of the United States government and its political subdivisions where there is no republican form of government and its separation of powers. By applying Public Laws for your private benefit, you can break that dictatorial jurisdiction anytime you choose.

The insidiousness of the 14th Amendment is that even though it is private contract law of a trust, it is not a bilateral contract where both parties sign the document after a meeting of the minds. The 14th Amendment is "quasi contractual." That is, it is not a true contract as recognized in the general common law, rather it is called an "adhesion" or "unilateral" contract where only one party binds himself. In this case, a person agrees to the private trust law merely by his silence. If a person does not speak up to let his choice be known, the trust will assume he or she is a part of and beneficiary of it. They will assume that you have gifted your life to the trust for the benefits they have to offer.

Under the 14th Amendment, the citizen [who does not make his choice known for or against the trust relationship], is assumed to be a beneficiary because he or she has not stated otherwise. As a beneficiary, you are an outlaw as far as the Constitution is concerned. You are operating outside of the Constitution. While operating outside the Constitution you only have relative rights under the Bill of Rights and the Constitution because private contract law takes priority over constitutional law.

http://freedom-school.com/history/usa.html#expatriation

  • Location: Except the Few!!
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2930460435

Googling Expatriation Statute brought me to a carbon copy on Daily Paul, posted in 2009. TxRedneck is the PAC operative defending the post, and judging from his post history, seems to have a strange sense of history. (though I have to admit, I did enjoy doing the detective work in verifying some of his claims).

If you click on the freedom-school link, it will take you to the original text written by Lee Brobst, and features two citations in the first paragraph, and no citations anywhere else in this section.
55. 15 United States Statutes at Large, Ch. 249-250, pps 223-224, Section 1, R.S. 1999, 8 USC 1481. 
56. Briehl v. Dulles, 248 F2d 561, 583 at footnote 21, (1957).
Here's 8 USC 1481 and Briehl v. Dulles (1957) - or better yet, Kent v. Dulles (1958) (I'm wondering if Lee Brobst is whitewashing the references to Communism in the case, because god forbid a Communist does something even remotely good...). Neither of which support Brobst's claims. Those two were probably cited to provide the illusion of authority. But I'll play along.

I took a look a footnote 21 (from Briehl v. Dulles), which says:
This act, though no longer included in the United States Code, has not been repealed and is still in effect. Savorgnan v. United States, 1950, 338 U.S. 491, 498-499, 70 S.Ct. 292
From the text (bolding mine): 
Almost a century ago, Congress declared that 'the right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,' and decreed that 'any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision of any officers of this government which denies, restricts, impairs, or questions the right of expatriation, is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government.' 15 Stat. 223-224 (1868), R.S. 1999, 8 U.S.C. 800 (1940).21 Although designed to apply especially to the rights of immigrants to shed their foreign nationalities, that Act of Congress 'is also broad enough to cover, and does cover, the corresponding natural and inherent right of American citizens to expatriate themselves.' Savorgnan v. United States, 1950, 338 U.S. 491, 498 note 11, 70 S.Ct. 292, 296, 94 L.Ed. 287.22 The Supreme Court has held that the Citizenship Act of 1907 and the Nationality Act of 1940 'are to be read in the light of the declaration of policy favoring freedom of expatriation which stands unrepealed.' Id., 338 U.S. at pages 498-499, 70 S.Ct. at page 296. That same light, I think, illuminates 22 U.S.C.A. 211a and 8 U.S.C.A. 1185. Since expatriation is today impossible without leaving the country,23 the policy expressed by Congress in 1868 and never repealed precludes a reading of the passport and travel control statutes which would permit the Secretary of State to prevent citizens from leaving.
Footnote 23:
8 U.S.C.A. 1481 and 1483; Savorgnan v. United States, 338 U.S. at page 503, 70 S.Ct. at page 298
Also,  here's Savorgnan v. United States (1950). Basically, one can lose their US citizenship by getting citizenship from another country, and going to that country to live there (in their abode).

So there you have it, I defeated Lee Brobst with his own citations. If you wanna expatriate, you gotta leave the United States. So called Republics of Makebelieve do not count.








Bonus: Racism in /pol! Guess which ones are RJ's (he isn't the only ultra conservative troll on /pol).

Al Sharpton Proves There's Such A Thing As A Nigger (Black Race Baiter)


Date: 2012-03-31, 2:06AM EDT
Reply to: 72zhd-2932069183@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


You know he is.........
  • Location: Black Race Baiter
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2932069183

Al Sharpton: A Product of Liberalism ( Race Baiters !)


Date: 2012-03-31, 2:11AM EDT
Reply to: g4pft-2932071727@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


Admit it Libs.........Al Sharpton is a opportunist, and you love him.
  • Location: Race Baiters !
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2932071727


LIBS Created The Black Fatherless Gangtas With Welfare (Young Hoodie Gangstas With No Dads)


Date: 2012-03-31, 2:18AM EDT
Reply to: xzpkj-2932075399@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


No Dads = Instant Welfare for the moms

You LIBS destroyed the young black males, cause your system of welfare rewards single black mothers with children

Now they look to rappers to guide them, instead of Dads.
  • Location: Young Hoodie Gangstas With No Dads
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2932075399


Yes, We Know There Are White Niggers As Well (White Trash Destroyed By Fatherlessness)


Date: 2012-03-31, 2:22AM EDT
Reply to: grm68-2932077761@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


Yes, your LIB courts destroy white families as well by promoting a Fatherless world in Divorce Courts (Probate Courts)

Then you LIBS have the audacity to call the courts "Family Court".

You freaks are responsible for destroying young blacks (mostly) and white boys as well.
  • Location: White Trash Destroyed By Fatherlessness
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2932077761


Poor Stupid Black Gangstas Going To Die Cause of Sharpton/Jackson (Race Baiters War)


Date: 2012-03-31, 2:49AM EDT
Reply to: cdghj-2932090904@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


I feel bad for all the Fatherless Black Rapper Gangtas.

Sharpton and Jackson are going to get them killed after the Leftist Black Race Baiters start a race war.
  • Location: Race Baiters War
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2932090904

Incestual racist dipshits invade craigslist (bitchvill usa)


Date: 2012-03-31, 4:57AM EDT
Reply to: nprbd-2932136641@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


faggot alert!
  • Location: bitchvill usa
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2932136641

Republicans racist idiots r gonna get their asses handed to them this (election)


Date: 2012-03-31, 5:00AM EDT
Reply to: g8xz8-2932137526@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


clowns, no one cares about your fuckin hick bullshit, fucking retards.
  • Location: election
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2932137526


pusssyyy ass racists (boston)


Date: 2012-03-31, 5:03AM EDT
Reply to: mfggr-2932138388@comm.craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


hide behind their keyboards. blow clanmaster wizard in the chicken roost ya little bitch
  • Location: boston
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2932138388


And that wraps up my return. See you next season!

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Other sovereign-esque posts on Craigslist.

Most of these posts aren't related to PACinlaw, but I'm sharing them anyway. I found them using the search term site:craigslist.org "14th Amendment".

"Rules are meant to be broken." - Morpheus, from The Matrix, posting from Anchorage, Alaska:


Blue pill or red pill? (Your mind)



Date: 2011-12-01, 6:57PM PST
Reply to: comm-pmdwf-2731394502@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]



From a speech in Congress in The Bankruptcy of the United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993, Vol. 33, page H-1303, Speaker Representative James Trafficant Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House states:


". . .It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 -- Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.


The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States. . .


Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens of mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "Hypothecated" all property within the Federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. Citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the Federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets, and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. Citizen to the Federal Reserve System. In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States Corporation all of the credit "money substitute" it needed.


Like any debtor, the Federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the Federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves," the U.S. Citizens, as collateral against the federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks, forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.


Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the People have exchanged one master for another."


* In 1944, Washington D.C. was deeded to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) by the Breton Woods Agreement. The IMF is made up of wealthy people that own most of the banking industries of the world. It is an organized group of bankers that have taken control of most governments of the world so the bankers run the world. Congress, the IRS, and the President work for the IMF. The IRS is not a U.S. government agency. It is an agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)




  • Location: Your mind
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
image 0image 1
image 2image 3
PostingID: 2731394502
The only thing that this post is missing are instructions on how I can access my $600,000 with my "sight drafts".

The bankruptcy of America already happened. Why so Serious??


Date: 2011-11-22, 11:05PM CST
Reply to: comm-unhmr-2716752817@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]


The Bankruptcy of The United States - FreedomFilter.Blogspot.com

United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303
Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:

"Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's report that will lead to our demise. 

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States?'

Gold and silver were such a powerful money during the founding of the united states of America, that the founding fathers declared that only gold or silver coins can be "money" in America. Since gold and silver coinage were heavy and inconvenient for a lot of transactions, they were stored in banks and a claim check was issued as a money substitute. People traded their coupons as money, or "currency." Currency is not money, but a money substitute. Redeemable currency must promise to pay a dollar equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) make no such promises, and are not "money." A Federal Reserve Note is a debt obligation of the federal United States government, not "money?' The federal United States government and the U.S. Congress were not and have never been authorized by the Constitution for the united states of America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, -gold and silver coin.

It is essential that we comprehend the distinction between real money and paper money substitute. One cannot get rich by accumulating money substitutes, one can only get deeper into debt. We the People no longer have any "money." Most Americans have not been paid any "money" for a very long time, perhaps not in their entire life. Now do you comprehend why you feel broke? Now, do you understand why you are "bankrupt," along with the rest of the country?

Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) are unsigned checks written on a closed account. FRNs are an inflatable paper system designed to create debt through inflation (devaluation of currency). when ever there is an increase of the supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs.

Inflation is an invisible form of taxation that irresponsible governments inflict on their citizens. The Federal Reserve Bank who controls the supply and movement of FRNs has everybody fooled. They have access to an unlimited supply of FRNs, paying only for the printing costs of what they need. FRNs are nothing more than promissory notes for U.S. Treasury securities (T-Bills) - a promise to pay the debt to the Federal Reserve Bank.
There is a fundamental difference between "paying" and "discharging" a debt. To pay a debt, you must pay with value or substance (i.e. gold, silver, barter or a commodity). With FRNs, you can only discharge a debt. You cannot pay a debt with a debt currency system. You cannot service a debt with a currency that has no backing in value or substance. No contract in Common law is valid unless it involves an exchange of "good & valuable consideration." Unpayable debt transfers power and control to the sovereign power structure that has no interest in money, law, equity or justice because they have so much wealth already.

Their lust is for power and control. Since the inception of central banking, they have controlled the fates of nations.

The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a "Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock and naming it a "Joint Stock Trust." The U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal "person" to duplicate a "Joint Stock Trust" in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3]

The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same.

Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principle.

Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913)

"Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.

In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another.

This has been going on for over eighty years without the "informed knowledge" of the American people, without a voice protesting loud enough. Now it's easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt.
Why don't more people own their properties outright?

Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less?

We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it.

America has become completely bankrupt in world leadership, financial credit and its reputation for courage, vision and human rights. This is an undeclared economic war, bankruptcy, and economic slavery of the most corrupt order! Wake up America! Take back your Country."

  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2716752817
Can you pick out the similarities between the two CL posts above? If you have guessed that quote by then Congressman James Traficant Jr, the goofy congressman with bad hair and denim suits and his expelled from the House because of his 10 counts of bribery, then you are correct!

Well, at least he dresses colorfully.
With regards to the second post, Traficant did in fact say that in the House Concurrent Resolution 64, Concurrent Resolution on the Budget, Fiscal Year 1994. (I assume that the quote is missing from the first post, considering that it reads like a first draft in comparison to the second post). However, Mr. Traficant did not say anything that would support the premise of either post. Hell, what he said doesn't even qualify as a speech to me.

Either way, I only have one life to live and I'm not going to bother debunking the rest of these two posts. Moving on...

1864 WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY - $100 (REDONDO BEACH)


Date: 2011-12-06, 8:04AM PST
Reply to: [REDACTED] [Errors when replying to ads?]


1864 WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY. COLLECTIBLE.
PRE - 14TH AMENDMENT VERSION.
BINDING IS IN EXCELLENT SHAPE.
$100.00. CASH ONLY.
PLEASE CALL [REDACTED].

  • Location: REDONDO BEACH
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
image 0image 1
image 2
PostingID: 2731408664
Better snatch that up quick, LB, before the whole world forgets that definitions change over time!

Now here's the creme of the crop:

Unusual Request (Downtown Boston)
Date: 2011-12-06, 10:44AM EST
Reply to: comm-v65vb-2738755304@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]



This may be an unusual request, but I need to find two people that can act as witness (with your signature) for some legal documents that I want to file. I have the paperwork ready to be mailed, but still need witnesses to complete my process. To act as a witness for my process, certain qualifications MUST be met.

1) Each witness must be 18 years of age, or older.
2) Each witness must have been born in Massachusetts.
3) Each witness must NEVER have voted in any election for public office - Local, State, or Federal.
4) I prefer each witness to have never even registered to vote.

If you meet these requirements and are willing to help me with this process, please get back to me asap. I am looking for a notary public to witness and sign these documents as well. I want to get my paperwork mailed out this month (December), if possible. As far as payment - I don't have much money, but I'm sure we can work something out. Thanks for reading.

  • Location: Downtown Boston
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2738755304

There are three possibilities that I can think of with this post:
  1. This is RJ, and he's not that far along into his expatriation/repatriation process.
  2. This isn't RJ, but someone that RJ recruited over Craigslist.
  3. This is unrelated sovereign citizen activity.
I strongly believe that this is a PAC related post. Firstly, it has a strong emphasis against participating in government, just like Bork promulgates. (But what if you're state employed?) Secondly, there's a strong emphasis on process. What process could one possibly go through that requires these restrictions, other than PAC's expatriation/repatriation process.

Having revisited Sarah Marie Chermak's experience, I doubt anything good will ever come of this.

Stay tuned for more...

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

No RJ in Sight.

I have a confession to make: I haven't monitored Craigslist for PACinLaw activity for a month and a half. It felt good, man.


Now that I'm energized and feeling committed to this blog, I did a site:craigslist.org search for possible PAC activity and I'm excited to say that I have found none. Whoopie! *knock on wood*

Craigslist is a tough place to sell ideas. If Bork's business model was to pay spammers to advertise (like he and RJ bragged about before), he would have gone broke even without active community moderation. CL is a great place to get burned, so I don't think a keen user base could really entertain Bork's scam the way that he thought it would. Sure, Bork might have gotten a few inquiries, no doubt, but how does one even sell incoherent books and pseudo-legal procedures? The website is practically a non-starter.

I wouldn't be too surprised if that is what really happened - Bork legit ran out of money and laid RJ off, and RJ doesn't work for free. Either that, or RJ was picked up by the police sometime ago because he's a deadbeat and owes child support.

However, I don't see this as a true victory, as I don't think there could ever be a true victory as long as the main website still operates. Perhaps now is a good time to examine all of the tentacles.

In the meantime, I have some old Craigslist posts that I want to share. They're not terribly relevant, but I feel that they are worth mentioning.

==========================================
Some time last month, I was engaged in an argument with RJ over the Healthy Workplace Bill. At first, I thought this was a KaptainAmericana/Ron Paul/Dreamer Deceiver production, but I noticed that every time I countered, it would be flagged within a few hours, which is a serious RJ hallmark.

(It helps to read the pink first)

RE 2: Healthy Workplace Bill (thank you sir, may I have another?)


Date: 2011-10-06, 10:28PM EDT
Reply to: your anonymous craigslist address will appear here


Yes, because the only way "job creators" can get a leg up in this economy is to make sure that they still have the right to maintain a shit-awful workplace.

"Sorry about your daddy's injury, little Jimmy. But I, the CEO, need to save every penny for my annual (undeserved) raise. It's what's good for the company. Now run along..."



--------------------------------
Healthy Workplace Bill And you stupid people wonder why there are no jobs you stupid liberals just don't get it.

Raise taxes on the rich = less pay for current Employees and much higher prices at the store and no one will be hiring any time soon.

Why the hell would they.

Healthy Workplace Bill...What Fucking joke.

it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2635426048
  • Location: thank you sir, may I have another?
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2636695037
I can't find the original Healthy Workplace Bill post, but I remember it being positive, like "Support the Healthy Work Place bill / let's get it introduced into all 50 states."

And to be perfectly fair, when I posted my response, I didn't research the Bill. I was trolling. But I also knew that RJ didn't read it either. So I did some research for the next post and found it to be quite reasonable containing no taxes or cost increasing regulations.

RE 4: Healthy Workplace Bill


Date: 2011-10-07, 3:25PM EDT
Reply to: your anonymous craigslist address will appear here


I absolutely refuse to believe that Healthy Workplace Bill will have any detrimental effect on employment opportunities.

For those of you who aren't familiar with the bill, click here:
http://www.healthyworkplacebill.org/index.php
http://www.healthyworkplacebill.org/bill.php

Anyone who cares about running a business knows what one bad apple can do to company morale and outward reputation. If you are seriously *that* opposed to the bill, then I don't want to know how you run your business, assuming you even run a business. (chances are, you *are* the bully!)

Nobody should have to suffer in a terrible workplace just to make ends meet.



----------------------------
Living in LA! LA! land fool? We already have 25% unemployment so you want it to be even harder for people to get a job?

What do you think all these dumb regulations do?

Go out and Start a business and see how much it cost to hire an Employee you dumb moonbat really wake the hell up ! and stop listening to that "Bed wetting liberal propaganda"

  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2637781863
I'm pretty sure it isn't regulations that cause businesses to not hire, it's the market. If there's money to be made, a business owner would hire to meet that demand. There's a reason why the current economic situation is called a recession - it's hard to hire if no one is really spending money for the business owner's service. So I challenged him - how exactly does a anti-bullying law (essentially) hamper your business?

Below: I never knew that using logic would lead to my current bed wetting problems!
RE 6: Healthy Workplace Bill (He's clearly deranged, your Honor)

Date: 2011-10-16, 11:38PM EDT
Reply to: your anonymous craigslist address will appear here


Something tells me that you have never run a business in your life, but I admit that I can be wrong.

In full detail, tell me what kind of a business you run.
-What product/service you offer.
-How many employees you manage.
-What kind of people you employ (sex, age, religion, sexual orientation, Socio-ethnic background)
-Style of hierarchy (eg. worker - foreman/specialist - manager - executive - CEO(meaning you))
-System of airing grievances (eg, Who handles complaints- you, the manager, or a HR compliance officer/lawyer? How do you resolve them? Do you have other channels like perhaps an anonymous "snitch" box?)

And in full detail, describe to me how the Healthy Workplace Bill hampers your ability to run a business. If you're Google inept, here's the link below.

http://www.healthyworkplacebill.org/

Skimp on the conservative dribble, please.


-----------------------------------------
That is because "YOU ARE BRAIN WASHED BY " "Bed wetting liberal propaganda".

The last thing this Economy needs is more stupid laws written by Bed wetting RICH liberals that never ran a business or even know how one works.

You and your RICH Bed wetting liberal friends could not run a lemonade stand..

Just take a look at the public schools you guys have destroyed the Education system all together.


--------------------------------------
[Quote] I absolutely refuse to believe that Healthy Workplace Bill will have any detrimental effect on employment opportunities.



Anyone who cares about running a business knows what one bad apple can do to company morale and outward reputation. If you are seriously *that* opposed to the bill, then I don't want to know how you run your business, assuming you even run a business. (chances are, you *are* the bully!)

Nobody should have to suffer in a terrible workplace just to make ends meet.



----------------------------
Living in LA! LA! land fool? We already have 25% unemployment so you want it to be even harder for people to get a job?


What do you think all these dumb regulations do?


Go out and Start a business and see how much it cost to hire an Employee you dumb moonbat really wake the hell up ! and stop listening to that "Bed wetting liberal propaganda"








[QUOTE]Yes, because the only way "job creators" can get a leg up in this economy is to make sure that they still have the right to maintain a shit-awful workplace.


"Sorry about your daddy's injury, little Jimmy. But I, the CEO, need to save every penny for my annual (undeserved) raise. It's what's good for the company. Now run along..."[/quote]








it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2650663744

  • Location: He's clearly deranged, your Honor
  • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 2653582512
And that was the end of that. No response, just flags. I also don't particularly like the fact that he edited out my links to the Healthy Workplace Bill website when he quoted me for his RE:5 (It's the only reason why I reproduced RE6: in full).

It was this post where I learned that I was dealing with RJ. I first noticed the BEING BRAINWASHED comment, which then was followed the typical comment about liberals ruining the education system (It's Dumbed down by Design hurrrrrr!).

From all of these posts, it's obvious that RJ doesn't run a business other than the business of pretending to run a business on the internet (and scamming people, of course). I sometimes wish RJ would engage in a real argument. I bet I can send him hurtling down to reality in less than 15 minutes. But, to be honest, I don't mind the silence either.