A PAC Success Story: Sarah Marie Chermak /// Reverse Engineering

Broken Oaths (Sarah Marie Chermak)

Google search for Sarah Marie Chermak.

I stumbled upon "Broken Oaths" a long time ago while researching RJ Mills, and back then, I didn't know what to think of it. It was completely incomprehensible me, and I disregarded it as full blown crazy after lightly skimming through it. It had some connection to the People's Awareness Coalition, but I wasn't sure how. Hell, I didn't want to know how. I was too busy picking on RJ to care.

It wasn't until a week or two ago, doing a Content Audit on Voter Cancellation letter that I got a case of Déjà vu. I seen form letters like this before, and I remember that Bork complained on NMG that someone broke confidentiality with PAC. Could this be the person? (here and here)

Sarah Marie Chermak probably joined PACinlaw before 2002, and based on proximity, has probably met LB Bork in person. She has sent many letters to many state and federal officials, often to receive no response. When she did get something back, it was something to the effect of "We don't know how to fulfill your request." She also had a few run ins with the law (arrested in '04, posted bail and fled WI to AR) and a few problems with the IRS, which is not surprising. Nor is it surprising that she still believes that she's free of U.S. influence, and that LB Bork didn't scam her at all in any way.

Here's her testimonial on Ripoff Report (Comment #5), to counter the original report:

#5 Consumer Comment

PAC is on point

AUTHOR: Sarah Marie - Lead Hill (U.S.A.)

SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 28, 2009

To Whom It May Concern at Ripoff Report:

In regards to the matter of PAC and LB Bork, I had completed the status correction process about six years ago. This process is impeccable. Other groups have all ignored or avoided the only point to address: the jurisdiction of the “United States”. LB's book entitled “Red Amendment” takes one through finely detailed history and irrefutable facts that outline and define the crux of our problems with this out of control corporation. The Red Amendment documents the sources drawn on to prove and support the fraud that has been perpetrated against all people of the fifty nations. During my process I have had the DOJ come to speak with me in where they questioned me on many different issues. I have a copy of their report in where it states, She will not be happy until she is out. This statement acknowledges there are definitely two different statuses/categories I can be in.

LB has spent many years and countless hours researching all points to reference and cross-reference his procedure. How LB uses the money in exchange for his information and procedure to keep things running is his business.

I have listened to others spout theories. Theories are like opinions; we all have them. I will take the facts, the truth, and the knowledge. Do not take my opinion here. Buy his book, The Red Amendment and read it for yourself. Then read the sources that are quoted and decide for yourself. Out of jail. In jail.

Sarah Marie Chermak 

What does she even mean by "Out of jail. In jail"? Also, "She will not be happy until she is out" is just a general statement.

She went through the process sometime 2003 - however Exhibit G doesn't list this important detail anywhere. I'm not convinced that she ever got out, or even received a positive acknowledgement of her claims. Furthermore, I don't think that there is one single piece of evidence that proves her premise whatsoever. At the very bottom, Sarah leaves this tidbit for everyone:

This list is NOT inclusive.  

These people and others are willfully involved in blatant violation of their oaths 
to the Constitutions which place them in treason and sedition by design, ALL 
military persons have a duty and obligation to intervene and hold these people 
accountable as ENEMIES BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.

Perhaps she has correspondences that irreparably damage her claims beyond the information she already laid out?

Despite this, I think that Exhibit G reveals a lot about the innerworkings of People's Awareness Coalition, and the innerworkings of its adherents' mental state. It's definitely worth studying.

R E V E R S E   E N G I N E E R I N G

Before I start, I must throw out my original assumption - that LB Bork doesn't do anything during the Nationality Correction process other than create a "State National" certificate, an ID card, and a license plate. LB Bork and his adherents definitely send something to the government. It also does more than nothing, it causes serious harm.

This is the apparent order one must go through to successfully become a "State National".
Phase 1:

1. Buy the Red Amendment at $30 (or $35 for the deluxe version). Read up on website literature too.
2. Request Nationality Correction Form, agree to contract, send Bork $225 as a down payment, and another $225 to start the process ($450 total, in blank money orders only). 
3. Pay for "State National" membership, at $300. Contract doesn't make it clear whether the membership fee is one time only. Failure to pay membership will probably disqualify the applicant. Contract also doesn't make it clear if license plate and ID card are included in that $300, or if they're extra; and if they have to be renewed yearly.

Phase 2:

1. Fill out "Amended Verification of Process of Status/Nationality; Rectification: Exhausting of Administrative Remedies; Subsidiary Contract", send it to everyone. See Exhibit E.
2. Fill out "Voter Cancellation Letter", send it to the State Elections Committee/Board.
3. Fill out "To all Government Agents..." and send it to everyone. See figure 1.
4. See Figure 2 below. Do all of that.
5. Send letter requesting verification of "Amended Verification of Process of Status/Nationality; Rectification: Exhausting of Administrative Remedies; Subsidiary Contract" See Request Copy.
6. Legally threaten anyone who gets in the way.

If government acknowledges your State National status, proclaim success. If not, repeat steps 1 - 6 in Phase 2. Hope that repeating these steps doesn't financially ruin you because of guru costs, USPS certified mail costs, state registry fees, IRS, and jail time.

Currently, Amended Verification of Process of Status/Nationality; Rectification: Exhausting of Administrative Remedies; Subsidiary Contract is my white whale. I have been looking up and down for that document and I can't seem to find it. However, I have found this:

Figure 1:

To All Government Agents Monitoring This Political Group:

To all Sundry by these Presents:

1) I, Scott Hostetter, Affiant, state that I am competent to testify and being of the age of majority affirm that my “yes” be “yes” and my “no” be “no” and that the facts contained in the instrument attached and incorporated hereto in exhibit are true, certain, correct, and not misleading under the penalty of the Law of bearing false witness.

2) I am executing this affidavit under my own free will, of full knowledge and, as being neutral, without any injurious intent to the United States, any state of State in or of the Union or the United States, or insurgent.

3) I am not trying to emancipate U.S. Citizens from your body politic. The United States needs citizen(s)/subject(s) to service it's debt; therefore, I am not trying to emancipate anyone.

4) I am not trying to provoke any U.S. citizen to rebel against the United States, the State of Iowa, the State of Nebraska, or any other corporate body politic to which they are members.

5) Refer to Johnson County Iowa Recorder, Book 4172, Page 787-928: Affidavit: Verification of Process of Status/ Nationality Rectification; Exhausting of Administrative Remedies; Subsidiary Contract

6) I am not a U.S. Citizen. I do not have a Social Security number. I do not have a State issued Birth Certificate. I do not have a State issued Driver's License. I do not have a State issued Marriage License. I am not a Registered Voter. I am not a member of the body politic(s) called the State of Iowa or the United States.

7) The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is my King and Sovereign. I am His servant and I am bound to obey His Laws. Authorities in support: Constitution for the United States of America, First Article in Amendment, Public Law 97-280 (1982), United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965), Acts 5:29.

8) “Nemo Ex Consilio Obligatur” = “No man is bound for the advice he gives.

9) “Qui Tacet Consentire Videtur” = “He who is silent appears to consent.”

10) “Privilegium Est Quasi Privata Lex” = “A privilege is, as it were, a private law.”

11) “Cujus Est Commodum Ejus Debet esse Incommodum” = He who receives the benefit should also bear the disadvantage.”

12) “Que Sentit Commodum, Sentire Debet Et Onus” = “He who derives a benefit from a thing, ought to feel the disadvantages attending it.”

13) “In Maleficio Raithabitio Mandato Caomparatur” = “He who ratifies a bad action is considered as having ordered it.”

14) “Fraus Et Dolus Nemini Patrocianari Debent” = “Fraud and deceit should excuse no man.”

15) I am bound to serve my Master, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and His law; Therefore, “Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant which is escaped from his master unto thee. He shall dwell with thee, even among you, in that place which he shall choose in one of thy gates, where it liketh him best. Thou shall not oppress him.” Deuteronomy 23:15-16.

16) If a United States citizen chooses to lawfully leave their servitude I am bound by Deuteronomy 23:15-16 not to return them to their master and I am not allowed to oppress them.

17) “The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government...he owes allegiance to the two departments, so to speak, and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties.” U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).

Further Affiant sayeth not,
Executed this14th day of the ninth month, A.D. 2009, by:
Scott Hostetter, with reservation of absolute rights.

There's nothing in the metadata that could identify the author, but the document has all of LB Bork's hallmarks - connection with "Amended Verification...Status/Nationality", unnecessary Latin maxims, complete misunderstanding of U.S. v. Cruikshank (1875) (same quote even!) and other irrelevant court cases such as U. S. v. Seger (1965). Bork must have written this, and Scott Hostetter just filled in his name (whoever he is).

So this document, and Amended Verification of Process of Status/Nationality; Rectification: Exhausting of Administrative Remedies; Subsidiary Contract are affidavits. Interesting, but doesn't an affidavit require a public notary? Or is this like swearing an oath of office type thing? And if it's that, shouldn't there be a meeting between the official and affiant? Finally, where is the statement of truth? How can this thing be an affidavit at all? 

Averment 3 looks like it came directly from Redemption Movement, such that citizens are collateral for US debt.

Sidebar: Can you imagine being a citizen of LB Bork's pre-14th state, where crazy shit like this is the norm, and anyone can draft their own shaky affidavit and legally skull-fuck you (via identity theft)? Christ, I'll take the current "Communist States of America" over Bork's dream world any day!

Anyway, this document got me thinking, is everything an affidavit in PAC services? Using the find function on Exhibit G, searching for 'affidavit', I pieced together a list of some notable affidavits, notices, etc.

Figure 2:

• Affidavit of Negative Averment - just Googling this pulls up a mile long list of Sovereign examples. The one on Rochester Law looks like this, but is not indicative of PAC's (though the two groups are related. See my first post). Even JJ MacNab has one on her website. 
• Notice of Fault - Also pulls up a list of sovereign links. 
• Notice of Default - added with 'pacinlaw', pulls up this interesting transcript: Moody Gillseppe interviews Bobby Loman for First Amendment Radio. 
• Notice of Inquiry
• Declaration of Nationality - appears to be part of Bork's package including Birth Record Protest, Governor's Oath, Bona Fide Contracts, and U.S. Currency Protest. 
• Whatever this is: Land-rec 5/2 Affidavit - ? G. Index Affidavit - ? Land-rec 5/2 Documentation of National Stat - ?  G. Index Documentation of National Stat - ? Affidavit of Wim van der Graaf -who? Findings of Fact - ?
• Land Patent
• Notice of Formal Cancellation of Federal Citizenship and Nationality
• Notice of Immediate Removal of Private Property
• Notice of Fault Opportunity to Cure
• Demand for Due Process and Administrative Hearing
• Notice of Treason and Cultural Genocide

So what's the point in sending all of these documents?

In short: To simulate a legal process. It's highly fraudulent and a great way to wreck one's self. Every state has a law barring this.

Check out the Bobby Loman interview. Somehow getting the documents into the register is a step in stopping the IRS from collecting. Don't ask me how they arrive to this. In the end, I'm absolutely sure that even if your are an illegal alien, a "non-illegal alien", or even a real Martian, if you have an obligation to pay taxes, then no citizenship status change will change that. Search for 'alien' in the Tax Protester FAQ for more.  

Beyond that, it's all about looking legitimate enough for a stupid official to sign off on it. Someday, I'll expand this section further; But I'm getting the distinct feeling that every State National candidate is merely guinea pig to help refine Bork's nationality process. Bork is relatively a new comer (1999), and Sarah is one of his first customers.

S A R A H' S   E X P E R I E N C E

As I mentioned before, Sarah Marie Chermak must have known LB Bork some time before 2002 by proximity (City of Kiel is pretty far from Kieler WI, but much closer than most of Bork's adherents). I don't know if she has a predisposition to Sovereign ideology -- (e.g. formerly a tax protester, partook in the Redemption Movement, belonged to a survivalist group of some kind) -- or what compelled her to seek PAC services. I speculate that she wasn't in good financial health, evidenced here:

10.        February 14, 2002, To:  Preston Jones, Register of Deeds, cert. 7001 
1940 0001 3972 3959, Wisconsin Open Records Provide specific statutes, 
Wisconsin has taken primary lien hold interest on private property, present 
contact info to proper party so that I may secure my own home.

13.        March 11, 2002, To:  Manitowoc County Treasurer, cert. 7001 2510 0005 6264 9840, Wisconsin Open Records and Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act, produce IRS official that has certified lien against private property, oath and bond, etc. 

And LB Bork/PAC happened to be there when she was in need of real help.

30.        July 6, 2002, To:  Ed Brey, cc Steven Rollins, Notice of Protest, Upon 
cashing enclosed check you are agreeing under penalty of perjury that there is 
no fraud involved whether innocent, negligent, or reckless.

And together they aggressively send notices and affidavits. Her highlighting scheme is kind of confusing, but if it means what I think it means, she's threatening Ed Brey and Steven Rollins of potential legal action over some perceived breach in oath to public office because they will not handle the check to her standards. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. (Steven Rollins - Manitowoc Corporation Council, Ed Brey - Manitowoc County Treasurer)

31.        July 10, 2002, To:  Racine County Department of Elections, cert. 7001 0320 0004 4097 9132, Second Notice of Voter Revocation.

I guess that Voter Cancellation Letter didn't work the first time.

38.         August 29, 2002, Letter received from Wisconsin Secretary of State.  Office of Secretary of State advised by DOJ not to file any documents in office 
unless specific statutory for filing document.  Documents are not within statutory 
authority of office; documents discarded.  Office not required to acknowledge 
receipt of said documents.  We do so as a courtesy to discourage further 
submittals.  Will discard further similar documents - no signature.

Well, there you have it. That is the reason why she can't get anywhere with this.

39.        September 5, 2002, Thomas a, Sturdivant and Debra Strauss, special 
agents from department of justice spoke with me from 4:35 pm to 6:30 pm 
regarding my desire to cancel dual citizenship and become self-sufficient. 
Meeting of the minds.

Nothing came of that, I bet.

75.        October 6, 2003, From: Division of Motor Vehicles, From Frank Busalacchi, need valid driver's license to drive. 

76.        October 19, 2003, To:  Frank J. Busalacchi, Department of Transportation, cert. 7002 0860 0004 3058 6960, re: license, registration, insurance, Title 18 USC Sec. 31 definition of "Motor Vehicle."

77.        November 5, 2003, To:  Frank J. Busalacchi, cert. 7002 0860 0004 3058 7028, Notice of Fault, provide statement under oath with findings of fact and conclusions of law substantiating my status is subject to legislative jurisdiction of the State of Wisconsin. 

79.        November 18, 2003, From: OGC, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, No compelling to register car and obtain driver's license. 

80.        December 2, 2003, To:  Frank J. Busalacchi, cert. 7002 0860 0004 3058 7035, Notice of Default Stipulation, Affidavit of Wim van der Graaf in regard to Findings of Fact, A Priori Notice. 

82. December 8, 2003, From: OGC, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, threatened with arrest. 

Looks like she's trying to threaten Frank because he won't make an exemption in WI State motor vehicle license laws for her. DOT fights back. Meanwhile, she tries to send more notices and affidavits of wrongdoing to the Revenue Department and was subsequently arrested. But first:

117.        October 10, 2004, Jeremy Kamp refused to identify self after he 
pulled me over. Kamp was hostile. Refused to present bond and/or license. 
Said he doesn't need one. Threatened me, "I know all about you." "You're in big
trouble now." "You're going to sit in jail." Kamp made phone call. Was told
he called "the big guy." Pasket refused to speak with me. Threatened with
arrest. I said: "Isn't your job to take me immediately without delay to a
judge?" Kamp, "No, you're going to jail." Me. "I believe it is your duty to take
me without delay in front of a judge. Which one are we going before?"
Pasket left scene. Kamp left scene. No one around. So I left.

Creepy, but you had it coming. Of course, why learn anything from it when you can continue sending bullshit documents? Below, the actual arrest in her own words:

126.        November 22, 2004, Abduction, Kidnapping, rape, solitaire 
confinement, physical endangerment, withholding of medical treatment, denial 
of counsel, denial of phone calf, denial of due process, denial of proper courts, 
denial of right to notify family as to whereabouts, denial of habeas corpus, etc. 
by Wilkins, Pfefferle, Laun, Dietrich, Brockway, and others unknown to me at 
this time but discoverable by records. I repeatedly requested to go before a 
magistrate at scene when handcuffed, in car after abducted and kidnapped, in 
sheriff's department. Repeatedly refused. Was mentally and emotionally in fear 
of personal safety by Brockway. Inattentive driving; playing on computer. No 
safety restraint applied to me. About halfway to Manitowoc, Brockway pulled 
out a black pair of gloves and slid them on. Phone rang to the tune of the Lone 
Ranger. Reason for actions states "On going problems." Repeatedly 
requested to see a magistrate upon arrival to county jail.  ALL persons present 
refused.  Friend handed over extortion money

So her entire world came crashing down because she couldn't be bothered to put on her seat belt and drive safely. Tsk tsk tsk...

162.        Went to Arkansas 1/4/05. In fear of life and safety

So she keeps doing her shtick with the IRS & FBI, and then flees the state (probably to avoid prosecution).

Fights over sheriff's bond:

172.        February 22, 2005, From: Steven Rollins, sheriff's bond is $25,000. birth date is 1/14/49.
173.        February 27, 2005, To:  Douglas LaFollette, Secretary of State, 
Wisconsin Open Records Law, Admit/Deny bond exists for Wisconsin 
Supreme Court Justices listed.

Before I regurgitate Exhibit G, she still isn't a "State National", and still has all kinds of legal problems. She still fights with the IRS over liens, and sent notices/affidavits to US Supreme court Justices, President George W. Bush, etc.. Later on she sends Notices of Treason and Cultural Genocide. I strongly recommend that you read this yourself, it's a hoot and an insightful look into a sovereign's mind.





In conclusion, Sarah Marie Chermak ought to ask herself if this is all worth it.

Sorry for the wait, still working on Historical Error

I dreaded the moment. There's just so smarminess to wade through, and I'm just too busy. I'm trying to tackle it piece by piece, every day I add to it. So far, I have the text dump, the old and new Historical Error in .jpeg format, and today I'm going to do some formatting and give it that blue-green background. Tomorrow, I'll be analyzing two pages a day. Hopefully, I'll be done with it next week.

-----------------------

On a side note, I was screwing on Quatloos on my off time today and noticed that the LB Bork thread had a new post. It's a stagnant thread, so I didn't expect this little gem to pop up.

buck09 posted this picture and text:

Bork now has a facebook fan page. You can see a photo of him promoting his stuff at a Tea Party Rally:

"I'm going to make an offer you can't understand."

I just lost it. Silk red shirt, pin striped jacket, combed back hair (there better not be a pony tail in the back), scruffy white beard. What a douche!

**UPDATE: In his profile, next to those two comics which I'm certain that he infringed, Bork has a picture of himself that confirms my worst fears - long hair pulled back into a ponytail. So he's a goon and a douche.**

Too old for Nickelback.

But wait, there's more! LB's Don't Tread on Me flag attached to a PVC tube. Such an act is sacrilege to the "Real Tea Party." You need a proper flagpole for that thing, asshole!

(I have to admit that I was too Commie to fully recognize that flag before I responded to buck09. It honestly looked like something else was written on it. Oh well, I'm allowed to have one dumb moment.)

But what ties the whole thing together: the ubiquitous Tea Party bus. Quick thought, why does it have caution tape all around it? If you lock the doors, nobody is going to get in. No need to break out the tape, guys.

To see Bork like this completely changes my perception of him. I thought he was a whole lot fatter (300+ lbs.), judging from his thumbnail pic. So congrats for not being a fat body, LB. But that douchey mobster look has got to go. Just because Jerry Kane died doesn't mean that there's a vacancy.

Thanks for the laugh, buck09.

PACinlaw Content Audit: Sovereign Citizen Myth / Voter Cancellation Letter

These two are quickies. First, we have a press release that is not too dissimilar to the introduction of The Origins of Sovereign Citizens. Second is a form letter to assist one in removing themselves from the voter registry. 

I know of no earlier versions.

T E X T  D U M P

* * * * * * * * PRESS RELEASE * * * * * * *
June 10, 2011
SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MYTH DANGEROUS TO AMERICA
The People’s Awareness Coalition (PAC), founded in 1998, is issuing a warning to all American patriots who are trying to overcome the system and get out from under liberty limiting regulations and so-called government oppression. Most, if not all, people involved in the so-called sovereign citizen movement may eventually be identified, targeted and suffer consequences as an effect of their desire for remedies that are not grounded in law.

Groups of “Tax Deniers,” “Sovereign Citizens,” “Straw Man” advocates, “Redemption” followers, and others pursuing many other unlawful and half-baked “freedom” remedies, all have one thing in common… These schemes are based on half truths, twisted law and fairy tales. Individuals and their continued pursuit in these areas will serve to further embolden a Federal Government intent upon suppressing the liberty movement altogether. Continued expansion of Federal power is dangerous for America and dangerous for all Americans.

According to PAC founder and author of The Red Amendment, LB Bork, “The individual man and woman are not sovereigns. The principle in America has always been that the state is sovereign via the people. Most of these people in the “freedom movement” are either ignorant and uninformed and are being taken by scam artists, or, their law research is flawed and incomplete.”

“As more Americans suffer loss of jobs, homes, and possessions and an erosion of individual freedoms, desperation will cause accelerated irrational behavior. Desperate Americans must be leery of scam artists and con men trying to sell sovereignty schemes promoting in effect legal gibberish and almost certain problems down the road,” continued Mr. Bork. “There is a right way to address this and there is a wrong way. PAC was formed to provide constitutional instruction and political insights and promotes the lawful remedy for State sovereignty.”

“For the record, the People's Awareness Coalition does not advocate the so-called “sovereign citizen” position or the multitude of its schemes,” added Mr. Bork. “We at the Coalition advocate and provide a path for individual’s peaceful, non- aggressive, non-participation in the current political systems.”

See Mr. Bork’s latest treatise “The Origin of Sovereign Citizens,” and go to PAC’s Press page for contact details, PAC Perspectives, Mission, and FAQs.
The Origin of Sovereign Citizens: http://www.pacinlaw.org/demons
* * * * * * * * * * * END * * * * * * * * * * *

M E T A D A T A

• Author: PACinLaw.org info@pacinlaw
• Subject:  Sovereign Citizens 
• Keywords: "Tax Deniers, Sovereign Citizens, Strawman, Redemption"
• Company: home
• SourceModified: D:20110610181118

A N A L Y S I S
As previously mentioned, this isn't too different from The Origins of Sovereign Citizens. Same emotional appeals are made, and his claims are still false.

Now onto Voter Cancellation Letter.
T E X T  D U M P

LETTER FOR TERMINATION OF VOTER REGISTRATION, i.e. WITHDRAW OF PARTICIPATION IN REBELLING AGAINST THE REPUBLIC.

[State/County] Department of Elections Registered Mail # : 0 000 000 000
Attn: [Head of Department]
[Address]
[City], [State] [zip]
month/day/year

Greetings [Head of Department], Served Party:
It has come to my startling attention that participating in elections generates a person to commit a crime pursuant to Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Such crime is perceived to be an act of treason, which is based on the breach of political allegiance to my (or a lawful) state government (emphasis added) that would have existed prior to said amendment.

As such operation of law is–simply put–unconscionable, I hereby formally and expressly DEMAND that my name, as it appears herein presented, or any variation thereof, be removed from the voter registration roles forthwith and cancelled ab initio (emphasis added).

I would very much appreciate a response from your department within thirty (30) days of your receiving this claim and demand which: 1) Certifies the expungement of such registration and the manner in which it was executed (emphasis added); 2) Explains why this department has acted in bad faith inasmuch as it failed to advise me that it was involving me in such an artifice and scheme.

If I do not hear from you in the time specified, by your silence it will be deemed that you are a knowing party to this artifice/scheme and my injuries will be figured accordingly. And the failure to certify1 that such legal hypothesis is not correct will deem it to be true and factual.

I am greatly anticipating your full cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,
[Name (as registered)]
C/O: [Address]
[City], [State - spelled out] [(zip - in brackets)]
COPIES OF THE PRECEDING HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:
[State] Attorney General
Attn: [State AG Name]
[Address]
[City], [State] [zip]
Certified Mail # : 0 000 000 000
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [NOTE: OPTIONAL NOTICES, BUT RECOMMENDED]
Attn: [AG Name], Attorney General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Certified Mail # : 0 000 000 000

1 The term “certify” means that the “Served Party” has to provide a sworn statement to include the following: 1) That the United States–and the State of [state]–has disclosed in good faith that the government of [state] is not a lawful government under the doctrines of international law nor the original U.S. Constitution; 2) That the State of [state] is in fact a quasi-political subdivision of the United States; 3) That every American that participates in any election is deemed a citizen of the United States–i.e., U.S. person or federal citizen; 4) That any such American (participating in elections) is a subject of Congress and/or the United States.

M E T A D A T A

• Author: PAC info@pacinlaw.org 
• Subject: Getting rid of your voter registration under the 14th Amendment
• Keywords: "Department of Elections. Voting,  Vote Fraud, Scams"
• Category: Government, Political, Constitution, Law, Nationality
• SourceModified: D:20091116210645

There are all kinds of ways to get off the voter rolls. Whether or not this letter will work is subject to debate, as different states have different rules regarding voter cancellation. In some states, like California, one can cancel their voter registration by contacting their County Elections Office. Whether or not a letter like this one would do it, I'm not sure. Perhaps a phone call first would clear things up, or maybe they need to see you in person before taking such an action like unregistering seriously.

Oklahoma, on the other hand, appears to be a friendlier state for the survivalist/religiously disabled, and has their own form for voter cancellation form. The form letter probably will work, assuming that it doesn't get lost in the paperwork, or get tossed because it breaks procedure.

In RJ's case, Massachusetts doesn't seem to allow voter cancellation. One can change parties, or be undecided, but that's it. I doubt that this letter would work, but it's worth the try. On the other hand, I hear that not responding to state and city censuses is a way to get off the rolls - but don't take my word for it.

To anyone out there who is serious about getting themselves off of the voter rolls, check up with your state for more details. I can't stop you -- even though this doesn't do much of anything, nor change your obligation to pay taxes. However, take my advice: write your own letter, and be kind. This letter is too aggressive and too crazy for anyone to take seriously, and might just get tossed because of it.

PACinlaw Content Audit: Origin of Sovereign Citizens

Origin of Sovereign Citizens is a 6 page document, current version [v.051911]. I do not know of any earlier version than the current one. Analysis is provided on a page by page basis to preserve readability, with a summary at the end. Very mild use formatting was done on the text dump to make it more readable. The document can be grabbed here.

And finally, I'm always gathering more information, so expect this document to be expanded later.

F O R E W O R D

Ever since I audited Human Resources Discussed, I have been struggling to find an appropriate direction to take the Content Audit. There was a definite narrative unfolding in the documents I downloaded so far, so I came up with three ways to best preserve that narrative:

1. Chronologically: HRD is the first, move to the next document by date of authorship.
2. Linked: The latest HRD links to a few other documents, go for the one that fits best, like Historical Error. 
3. Perceptually: Going in the order that makes sense to me. For instance, if I were a stranger that walked into PAC Headquarters, what would they try to teach me first? I think they would go easy first, "deprogram" me, sell me more complex stuff, and then reveal their deepest topics. I dub this the Scientology process. 

First makes the most sense to me, but it is difficult to ascertain the chronological order of these documents. The second would be great, if the related documents made sense in that order. If one were to click pacinlaw.org/gods in the new HRD, it would go to the NMG forum post that lists even more documents without any motivating summaries. Thanks, but no thanks. To make matters worse, Historical Error is a deeply complex document. Surely there has to be an easier way to jump into this, right? Luckily, there's a link to pacinlaw.org/demons, which brings us to this easier-to-digest document. 

T E X T  D U M P
P a g e  1

THE ORIGIN OF SOVEREIGN CITIZENS © Authored by PAC info@pacinlaw.org

"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." —Thomas Jefferson 

Introduction

The unrest of people in America has been on the rise due to the loss of jobs, homes, and possessions. Adding insult to injury, Americans are also feeling a significant reduction of liberties and more control being exerted on them by those who they believe are protecting them. As a result of this situation, many people have investigated the cause of their plight and discovered a substantial change in government after the Civil War. It has been discovered that after the war citizenship in America changed giving the federal power new centralized control over the people. Most people searching for the truth have honor and are looking for a valid remedy; however there will always be those people who hope to lead honorable people away from the truth for personal gain. To make matters worse, it appears that those factions invested in the deception have labeled all truth-seekers as "Sovereign Citizens" in order to demonize them. 

Facts Surrounding Sovereign Citizens 

Understanding constitutional law, the 14th Amendment is the direct cause of the so-called the "Sovereign Citizen" movement. This amendment established two distinct things, it: 1) created a dual citizenship on the peoples of the states that pulled them into the control of Congress; 2) extended federal protections to corporations which allowed them to have more power. Accordingly, the amendment caused multiple tools of intrusion to be developed by the legislatures so that people could be controlled by law via the States and the United States. This control included the spawning of several agencies that people are subject to; and again had given corporations equal, or at times, superior power over the people of America.

People's Awareness Coalition and Nationality 

For the record, the People's Awareness Coalition (PAC) does not advocate the so-called sovereign citizen position. There are factors of law which are much more precise that we have found that are applicable to the current situation under the 14th Amendment. Taking back the nationalities of our countries over the United States nationality is our immediate remedy for protecting our natural rights under the Constitution. 

The Ability To Maintain Control 

As the corporate structure benefits immensely from this system under the 14th Amendment, there is a need to keep it in existence. To maintain control of this system, there has to be a multitude of devices used. Race strife is one of the major tools used by the maintainers. The race card emerges when anyone challenges the amendment. Race was the public sales tool used to sell the amendment in the first place. Of course, with a little research one will find it is a farce. Agent Provocateur programs are another method of obfuscation for the benefactors to maintain control of the created empire. Disinformation is established on many fronts for would-be patriots to use and possibly get in legal trouble, or get sent down a wrong path. 

People’s Awareness  Coalition

pacinlaw.org 

 Download this six page document at www.pacinlaw.org/demons [v.051911]

The Origin of Sovereign Citizens starts off with an obviously cherry-picked quote from Thomas Jefferson. Here's the whole quote:

And say, finally, whether peace is best preserved by giving energy to the government or information to the people. This last is the most certain and the most legitimate engine of government. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people. Enable them to see that it is their interest to preserve peace and order, and they will preserve them. And it requires no very high degree of education to convince them of this. They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.
--Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1787.

Here's the largest body of Thomas Jefferson quotes regarding education that I could find on the internet. It's not surprising that LB Bork would ironically misappropriate a quote from a Founding Father, and neuter it's true meaning -- a call for public education for all to secure freedom and liberty from the makings of a tyrannical government. Thomas Jefferson has the 'it' factor, street cred, and name-brand recognition that Bork could never have, no matter how many books or PDF Documents he writes. So Bork tries to cash in on it by opening with an abbreviated Thomas Jefferson quote to make his theories easier to pander to potential marks.

It only takes five minutes of searching to realize the folly in quoting someone who doesn't support Bork's core values. In my opinion, he probably didn't think that anyone would fact check a Thomas Jefferson quote, which  explains why he ran with it.

The Introduction makes an emotional appeal, preying on desperate people looking for relief. It's strong enough to net anyone, until he continues that the problems result from a dramatic change in government after the Civil War (It took them a while... but man, they really caught up! Sorry about your house though...). It's obvious that he's talking about the 14th Amendment, and the secret cabal of government lawyers out to attack him and his cohorts, (rightfully) labeling him a sovereign citizen. You know, the "Maintainters and Deceivers" bit. But even without the paranoia, the introduction makes a Post Hoc fallacy, such that because the Civil War happened and the 14th Amendment's change of citizenship, it is directly related to today's recession and job losses, which is simply not true at all.

The Facts Surrounding Sovereign Citizens paragraph makes an interesting claim, that the 14th Amendment caused the Sovereign Citizen movement because it establishes dual citizenship and stronger corporate rights (more than a citizen). Though the reality is that the roots of Sovereign Citizens - specifically LB Bork's variation, comes from the racism in response to the Civil Rights movement gaining significant traction using the 14th Amendment positively.

Accordingly, the amendment caused multiple tools of intrusion to be developed by the legislatures so that people could be controlled by law via the States and the United States. This control included the spawning of several agencies that people are subject to; and again had given corporations equal, or at times, superior power over the people of America.

Peculiar statement. "States Rights" argument without states. Which leads to the PAC's stance on (other) sovereign citizen positions; they don't support them. LB Bork claims that he has the true solution, though the reality is that most sovereign citizen positions have failed in court, so he made up something else. The true goal of his movement is based on Political Theory 101, that more people that join his movement to recreate the antebellum state, the more legitimate that state becomes, and ultimately replacing original post-14th Amendment state. Truly a no finer example of "I'm going to take my own ball and go home."

The ability to maintain deception deflects the true point of the 14th Amendment - equal protection under the law. It is about race, but he uses the race card to deflect it's validity because he does not have an effective argument against it. From this he asserts that the 14th Amendment needs the state to stay alive, but the reality is that the Supreme court has defended the 14th Amendment time and time again, and it can stand for itself. There's really no need to establish a protectionist apparatus, or believe that one exists for that matter.

Ultimately, what makes that paragraph effective is that it explains how he was victimized, and no matter how illegitimate his claim of victimization is, it serves an effective appeal to emotion.

P a g e  2

Accordingly, this serves as a tool of ridicule to demonize anyone that would expose the system. It further creates massive income for the law industry through legal fees, and money for the prison industry. 

Distinction between People's Awareness Coalition and Attorneys 

The People's Awareness Coalition has the goal in educating people of America in regard to the change of government that took place just after the Civil War. In contraposition in an attempt to educate the people of America, attorneys believe they have a monopoly on the law, wherefore keep their "trade secrets" to themselves. Some have the attitude that their level of intelligence is greater; and accordingly treat anyone who is not in their circle like they are inferior. To protect their monopoly and stream of enormous income, some seek to ridicule and destroy people of America rather than make an attempt to educate them. 

The States are Republics 

Alexander Hamilton, the main architect of the Constitution for the United States of America, set forth in Federalist Paper number 9 that all the states are republics in the United States federation: “As this government is composed of small republics, it enjoys the internal happiness of each.” These several republics have their own nationality and citizenship; but they have been interfered with by the United States and its 14th Amendment and legislation. The subversive system operates off something called cooperative federalism. There are other words for this that obfuscate the actual political plan: the common one being termed "Democracy". The blueprint for its operation was drafted by Karl Marx. 

14th Amendment creates De facto system 

Having an alternate political system creates if not a new, but alternate, governmental system. Due to that fact that a new "political body" was created by the "national" or "federal" citizenship, the governmental system under the 14th Amendment is "de facto". To create a whole new system, a different constitution would have to have been installed. In defining a de facto government, the following citation illustrates: de facto government. A new government which exercises undisputed sway over the entire country, the former established government having been nullified by successful rebellion or having lost the support of the people. A de facto government arises where the established government has been subverted by rebellion, so that the new government exercises undisputed sway for the time being over the entire country, or where the people of any portion of a country subject to the same government throw off their allegiance to that government and establish one of their own, and show not only that they have established a government, but also their ability to maintain it. —Am J Rev ed Internat L § 12 (International Law) 

A most important statement should be noted in that cite: "...but also their ability to maintain it." Understanding that citizenship determines the political affiliations that governs a state or country, people have thrown-off their fidelity or "allegiance" to the lawful political system of the Constitution. Instead they have opted for a political and legal system that is created by the United States' 14th Amendment. The rightful or "de jure" law principles must be recognized or else it would not be a de facto government. Like a parasite, this alternate system has attached itself to the Constitution and uses its blood, thus goes undetected. The demonized "sovereign citizens" strive to be a part of the rightful or de jure system. Herein we have briefly gone over how they "maintain" this alternate system : attorneys, fear, ignorance, and disinformation on multiple levels (established by multi-national corporations), are all major tools. 

The Origin of Sovereign Citizens People's Awareness Coalition  •  2 | Page

The Distinction between PAC and attorneys.
This paragraph should only be read one way: we're not attorneys, nor did we ever attend law school. But we'd love to be attorneys. If only they'd let us in... :-(. It's an emotional appeal designed to strike fear and contempt for everyone in the legal profession. Note the stereotyping of lawyers being an exclusive club of condescending jerks out to screw decent God fearing people. We all know that they're decent lawyers out there working to provide the best representation of their client, or provide advice and other useful services, and LB Bork acknowledges this by hedging his statement with "some."

The States are Republics.
Full text of Federalist Papers #9 here. Full quote:

"As this government is composed of small republics, it enjoys the internal happiness of each; and with respect to its external situation, it is possessed, by means of the association, of all the advantages of large monarchies.''

The problem with Bork's argument is that Hamilton never said that each state is a nation unto itself. Furthermore:

The definition of a CONFEDERATE REPUBLIC seems simply to be "an assemblage of societies,'' or an association of two or more states into one state. The extent, modifications, and objects of the federal authority are mere matters of discretion. So long as the separate organization of the members be not abolished; so long as it exists, by a constitutional necessity, for local purposes; though it should be in perfect subordination to the general authority of the union, it would still be, in fact and in theory, an association of states, or a confederacy. The proposed Constitution, so far from implying an abolition of the State governments, makes them constituent parts of the national sovereignty, by allowing them a direct representation in the Senate, and leaves in their possession certain exclusive and very important portions of sovereign power. This fully corresponds, in every rational import of the terms, with the idea of a federal government.

Remember, the Federalist Papers are not the Constitution. Hamilton is trying to make a sale here, so he's trying to assuage people of their fears that their state would no longer exist. A government composed of small republics is an apt sales point regarding the structure of the state, exacting accuracy be damned. To conclude, Bork's understanding of Federalist #9 is a complete fabrication. (Personally, I wouldn't be too surprised if his method of research is to make a printout of whatever he was researching, pinning it up against a bulletin board, and throwing darts at it. If a dart hit a word, he would just run with the sentence it belonged to and make it work.)

The second part of the paragraph isn't much better. The biggest interference that the 14th Amendment caused is that it stopped formerly Confederate States from passing more black codes, and other laws designed to enslave black people via imprisonment (though it didn't stop the coming of Jim Crow, unfortunately). And to say that democracy is part of Karl Marx's blueprint, such that democracy is a stepping stone towards Communism, is a slippery slope fallacy.

14th Amendment Creates a De Facto System.
Dense hodgepodge of emotional fantasy and unsupported legal theory. Basically it claims that the pre-civil War states are de jure (by law), and the 14th Amendment made it a de facto vampire. It's based on the fact that Southern States were reneging on their agreements post Civil War and creating an underground system of slavery, forcing the Radical Republicans in Congress to pass rigorous standards (Reconstruction acts, 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments) that Southern States had to meet before reentering the Union.

To Bork, this is a massive power grab that Congress had no right in doing, such that the laws and amendments passed and instituted by this grab are null and void because they were not the will of the people - of course discounting the Election of 1866 that gave Radical Republicans full control of Senate and House. Not those people, he means God fearing Confederates! And the 13th amendment did contain language that states that congress may enforce the law appropriately. And Civil rights act of 1866 hinted towards. And the court case Texas v. White (1869) that states that seceding states never had the right to secede.

The legal fiction that the 14th Amendment turned states into de facto vampires while the original state still exists secretly underneath sounds suspiciously lifted from Redemption theory. The Redemption theory claimed that every person is bound to a strawman (fictitious person, spelt in capital letters) that is also an account containing $630,000 of collateral. Through obscure paperwork in different ink sent in a specific order, one can free themselves from their strawman (thus freeing themselves from authority), and collect from the account.

The 14th Amendment state is like the strawman, and the "lawful government" is the real name that legally frees one from the 14th Amendment state. Because somehow the "lawful government" is so much better.

P a g e  3

Authorities in Support 

Now to provide some evidence that illustrates the change of citizenship and installs the system of federal private law that treats people as "legal entities". If you have trouble understanding the following, maybe a friend who is a lawyer can assist you in an explanation. If he is a man of God he would be willing. 

Authorities in support of political change: 

De jure Citizen(s) Reference : “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the acts heretofore passed on that subject. Approved April 14, 1802. Section 1. Be it enacted, &c, That any alien ... may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them..." The verbiage noted as "..., or any of them" shows that there were "citizens" of each state that are or were distinct from a so-called "national", "federal", or "citizen of the United States" citizenship. The Intent of the 14th Amendment : "We intend to make citizenship National. Heretofore, a man has been a citizen of the United States because he was a citizen of some-one of the States: now, we propose to reverse that, and make him a citizen of any State where he chooses to reside, by defining in advance his National citizenship—and our Amendment declares that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” Page 64, The Reconstruction Problem, speech of James Blaine, Skowhegan, Maine (August 29, 1866) Disenfranchisement of De jure Citizens : Dyett v. Turner, 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403 (1968). Also see Section 2 of the 14th Amendment which causes the actual "rebellion" by an operation of law and the disenfranchisement of the lawful citizens of the several republics in the Union. Download the paper "Historical Error" on the disenfranchisement subject : www.pacinlaw.org/error

Interestingly enough, there is a doctrine or practice—if you will—that allows the courts of America to not hear political questions. This allows the system to sustain itself with the help of the "maintainers". People who are voting, silent, and taking benefits are the ones who consent to be governed by it.

Authorities in support of legal change: 

Instead of people being men and women and subject only to public law, they are "legal entities" under the 14th Amendment United States person status, thus "controlled" by the legislatures in all respects: 

CITIZEN OF A STATE: A citizen of the United States, residing in any state of the Union; Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.  See citizens resident in the state. CITIZENS RESIDENT IN THE STATE: NATURAL PERSONS who are citizens and residents, and CORPORATIONS chartered in the State. —Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, Third Edition 

Excerpts from The Institutes of Roman Law, by Rudolph Sohm (1892), the Law of Persons:

The jus privatum was throughout a law for the individual only, and hence—as far as the old private law of Rome was concerned—there could be no subject of rights and duties other than a natural person, i.e. an individual. Roman private law had originally no room for 

The Origin of Sovereign Citizens People's Awareness Coalition  •  3 | Page

Authorities in Support 
How treating people like they're legal entities is a bad thing, I don't know. LB Bork must be using his own definition of it, and couldn't be bothered to add it into his islandmakers.us/lexicon page.


Authorities in Support of Political Change  

De jure Citizen(s) Reference : “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the acts heretofore passed on that subject. Approved April 14, 1802. Section 1. Be it enacted, &c, That any alien ... may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them..." The verbiage noted as "..., or any of them" shows that there were "citizens" of each state that are or were distinct from a so-called "national", "federal", or "citizen of the United States" citizenship.

The cite in question comes from the Naturalization Law of 1802. Relevant section:

3.-1. An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the acts heretofore passed on that subject. Approved April 14, 1802. 7 Hill, 137. 
     Sec. 1. Be it enacted, &c, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on the following conditions, and not otherwise: First, That be shall have declared, on oath or affirmation, before the supreme, superior, district, or circuit court, of some one of the states, or of the territorial districts of the United States, or a circuit or district court of the United States, three years at least before his admission, that it was, bona fide, his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whatever, and particularly, by name, the prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, whereof such alien may, at the time, be a citizen or subject. Secondly, That he shall, at the time of his application to be admitted, declare, on oath or affirmation, before some one of the courts aforesaid, that he will support the constitution of the United States, and that he doth absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whatever, and particularly, by name, the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whereof he was before a citizen or subject; which proceedings shall be recorded by the clerk of the court. Thirdly, That the court admitting such alien shall be satisfied that he has resided within the United States five years, at least, and within the state or territory where such court is at the time held, one year at least; and it shall further appear to their satisfaction, that, during that time, he has behaved as a man of good moral character, attached to the principles of the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same: 

"or any of them" does not support the claim that states are their own separate countries. More importantly, the 14th Amendment does not make citizenship "national", it extends equal protections under the law to the state level.


I'll save that disenfranchisement claim for Historical Error.


The Supreme Court has never heard political questions, ever, since it's inception. Their realm is law only.

Authorities in Support of Legal Change
Bork is being glib about legal entities once again. and supports it with an irrelevant entry from Ballentines Law Dictionary, 3rd ed, and an irrelevant excerpts from Institutes of Roman Law. The purpose is to claim that the other, secret intent of the 14th Amendment is to make corporations like people, but it's not true. Corporate personhood as we know it came from Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, thus making his conclusion on page 4 utterly flawed.


P a g e  4

gigantic corporate personalities so vastly exceeding the dimensions of the individual personality. Originally, it was neither capable not desirous of supplying the law for any other proprietary relations but those of private persons in the strictest sense of the term, i.e. individual persons. Nevertheless the Roman lawyers succeeded, as we have seen, in securing the recognition of corporations within the domain of private law.

So you see, lawyers of America had done the same thing to the peoples of the republics of the Union that lawyers did to the people of Rome. The 14th Amendment empowers corporations with property rights and protections just as if they were people. This was the true purpose of the Civil War. 

The Rightful System of Law: 

Below is the description of the "Common Law" system compared to the "Natural Person" system: COMMON LAW. As distinguished from statutory law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs. It consists of those principles, usage and rules of action applicable to government and security of persons and property which do not rest for their authority upon any express and positive declaration of the will of the legislature. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition 

So you see, people can live in their republics and not be in "The State" (14th Amendment States). 

Beware the Maintainers are Deceivers 

A tool of maintaining the system is deception. People should be particularly careful when listening to most lawyers and attorneys. These "maintainers" of the system practice a thing called sophistry. Sophism, in its modern definition from Plato, is noted as a specious argument used for deceiving someone. QUI VULT DECIPI, DECIPIATUR. Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived. That ancient maxim of law is used by all maintainers, be they attorneys, agent provocateurs, etc. 

People's Awareness Coalition Welcomes You 

The Coalition has been separating the wheat from the chaff since 1998. Our primary goal is to assist the  people of America in gaining back their freedoms under the pre14th Amendment style law system. 

Our latest program is entitled the Island Makers Project. The purpose of this project is to provide an understanding of who is dividing people by various means which keeps us in the maintainers' servitude. 

Please join us in appropriating education and freedom that the republics provide!

The Origin of Sovereign Citizens People's Awareness Coalition  •  4 | Page

You have probably seen the rest of this page from the Human Resources Discussed audit. Same argument applies, I have yet to see how Bork defines "Natural Persons' system." (I'm only interested in his, not someone else's).

P a g e  5

Island Makers Project Lexicon
A glossary (lexicon) of the terms used in the Island Makers Project may be viewed at the following:
www.islandmakers.us/lexicon
Also download a PDF version of the IMP Lexicon at the following location on the web:
www.islandmakers.us/implex
The Problem is in the Mirror
As covered above, the persons who benefit off this system maintain control through various means. Be it compartmentalization through education, religious strife, race division, deception, power, the list goes on.
The justice of this court understood the problem that we ultimately face:
The chief enemies of republican freedom are mental sloth, conformity, bigotry, superstition, credulity, monopoly in the market of ideas, and utter benighted ignorance. —Citing Justice Black in Adderley v. State of Florida (1967)
So, hopefully you can now visualize the problem with your lack of freedom. That aside, the maintainers have an interest of keeping you in servitude so they can appropriate your wealth with their system. Also, understand that there are more of us then there is of them, so the battle we face can be won with unity.
Entities Maintaining Control
We have provided a short list of some of the active individuals or organizations that maintain control:
Short List of Perpetrators: Attorneys/Professionals Maintaining the System : Quatloos : http:// www.quatloos.com Owner, Jay Adkisson : http://www.jayadkisson.com Red Crayons : http://www.redcrayons.net Owner, JJ MacNab : http://www.deathandtaxes.com Daniel Evans : http:// www.evans-legal.com
Organizations Playing the Race Card: Southern Poverty Law Center : http://www.splcenter.org The Anti-Defamation League : http://www.adl.org
Propaganda Machine Tactics : The Ad Council : http://www.adcouncil.org
The Origin of Sovereign Citizens People's Awareness Coalition  •  5 | Page

Adderly v. State of Florida (1967) is about state property not always being public property - in this case, a prison is not public property and therefore not an appropriate place to protest. LB Bork is quoting a footnote, reproduced below:

[ Footnote 1 ] "Where would we really find the principal danger to civil liberty in a republic? Not in the governors as governors, not in the governed as governed, but in the governed unequipped to function as governors. The chief enemies of republican freedom are mental sloth, conformity, bigotry, superstition, credulity, monopoly in the market of ideas, and utter, benighted ignorance. Relying as it does on the consent of the governed, representative government cannot succeed unless the community receives enough information to grasp public issues and make sensible decisions. As lights which may have been enough for the past do not meet the needs of the present, so present lights will not suffice for the more extensive and complex problems of the future. Heretofore public enlightenment may have been only a manifest desideratum; today it constitutes an imperative necessity. The First Amendment, says Justice Black, `reflects the faith that a good society is not static but advancing, and that the fullest possible interchange of ideas and beliefs is essential to attainment of this goal.' [From Feldman v. United States, 322 U.S. 487, 501 (dissenting opinion).]" Cahn, supra, at 102.

It's a good quote, and it had bearing on Justice Black's feelings, but it doesn't change the ruling. Why Bork picked it has yet to be understood fully, other than help make Bork's argument appear more 'cultured' and 'less repetitive'.

Enemies Maintaining Control
Let's face it, anybody who critically questions Bork is an enemy. We're all 'maintainers and deceivers.' But after reading this document, perhaps he's the one that needs to take a look in the mirror.

P a g e  6

Other People Exposing the Problem
You may find this list helpful in further understanding the problems that we face:
People Exposing the Legal Demons : Douglas Rushkoff : http://www.rushkoff.com
People Exposing DeEducation : Charlotte Iserbyt : http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com John Taylor Gatto : http://www.johntaylorgatto.com
NOTE: These two lists will grow. Updates are available at : www.pacinlaw.org/demons

NOTE: Updates are available in the form of PDF, this PDF being the latest. Not exactly an expansive list of intellectual allies.

M E T A D A T A
Author: LB Bork lb@pacinlaw.org
Subject: Sovereign Citizen Movement
Keywords: "Sovereign Citizen, Origin of Sovereign Citizens, Defining Sovereign Citizens, Sovereign Citizen Movement, Defining Sovereign Citizens, What is a Sovereign Citizens, Fourteenth Amendment, Common Law, LB Bork, PAC, People's Awareness Coalition, Demonize, Extremism, JJ MacNab, Red Crayon, Southern Poverty Law Center, Freedom Movement, The Red Amendment, What Are Sovereign Citizens, Maintainers. "
Category: Government & Politics
Comments: I would like to thank JJ MacNab for creating the impetus of this paper
SourceModified: D20110520175049


Regarding comments entry: Ohhh word, B? Is this because she took one look at your website and wrote you off as a sovereign citizen?

E X E C U T I V E    S U M M A R Y

Origin of Sovereign Citizens is a deliberately deceptive piece, using mostly emotional appeals and logical fallacies to create a sense of Us vs. Them, 'them' being a part of one great conspiracy in keeping people as slaves to the 14th Amendment. His legal theories thus far are fiction, and have no merit. However, he has written extensively on the 14th Amendment, so it will be interesting to see just how consistent his argument is over the next few documents.

His inability to cite his sources correctly is especially troubling, as LB Bork distorts his sources content and relevancy on a regular basis throughout this document. Too many people might take his claims at face value without doing any real research of their own.

Bro Talk: The Matrix

I have been running into more Matrix references in PACinlaw publications, that I can't ignore it anymore. I also plan on returning to this topic to expand/refine it later.

-----------
If there is one thing that LB Bork and PAC have in common with the rest of the sovereign leaders like David-Wynn:Miller, it is the bizarre fascination with The Matrix.

If you're not familiar with the movie, click here.

To me, it's strange that grown men would worship an action movie, let alone include it in their research material. Sure, it's a quotable movie, and it had good special effects, but it is not terribly deep. It's themes are self-explanatory (man v. machine, master slave relationship, humans as a power source, etc.), and the plot is fairly predictable. For example, the audience knows that good triumphs, even though they're not sure how considering the overwhelming odds. But they are sure that it will involve a lot of killing and pretty explosions.

One way or another, we all have seen something like The Matrix. When I first saw it, I immediately thought of Star Wars. A friend of mine who saw it with me felt the same way, but thought is was more like a cross between Star wars and Die Hard. Both of which feature an unlikely hero that faces an overwhelming evil, struggles against evil and sometimes self, and defeats evil.

The reality is that The Matrix is simply a new retelling of the same monomyth. The hero of every monomyth goes through the same cycle, so if you have seen one, you have seen them all. For example, Neo = Christ is a popular comparison that can be found in religious and non-religious academia.

What LB Bork treasures about the movie probably isn't any deeper than the movie's intellectual breadth. I posit that LB Bork finds this movie fascinating because it mirrors his projection of the sovereign citizens movement. He views himself to be just like Neo. Disturbed by the Waco Siege, Bork connects with others already in the movement who have been trying to free themselves from the oppressive government. Just like Morpheus training Neo how to bend the rules of the Matrix; sovereigns citizens trained Bork to know almost everything he needs to know about sovereignty from government (though I bet Bork would rather call himself an autodidact). Then finally, after six or seven years of research, LB Bork cracks the code and starts the People's Awareness Coalition (PACinlaw), just like Neo finally realizing his power and becoming the "One" as prophesied. Finally, both attempt to "wake up" others for the coming revolution - except LB charges them $450ea. first.

Another facet of LB Bork's projection is the violence. The Matrix fulfills his masculine power fantasies, that one man or small group can bring down an apparatus like the Matrix (or the government) through guerrilla tactics. It also features authority figures being killed (ex: Smith, guards in the lobby shootout), which is always a plus.

But like all things, The Matrix is aging, and it can't be relevant forever. There are plenty of new monomyths coming out of Hollywood that meet or exceed the PACinlaw's framework. Just recently, I had the chance to see Inception for the second time, and this time I couldn't get over just how easily I could incorporate that movie into PAC material. E.g. We're all in a dream world made by the government, and LB Bork is the man who tries to plant the seed of inception in all of us on different levels of consciousness. From it, we break free of the government's gulag-esque dream.

This leaves us with one question: Just how long until LB Bork abandons the Matrix for a newer and more relevant movie like Inception?  Place your bets below!

NMG Field Trip (part 10)

I have been thinking of an appropriate send off to the NMG series, but there's simply not much else that is worth commenting about. The forums just don't move that fast for me to care.

From the People Dividing the Movement subforum, Thread: "No, I am a State National." Gregory B tries to inject his own concept of "sense" into some UCC knuckleheads.

I've been engaged in a ideological battle of sorts with sovereign citizens, freemen on the land and followers of Tim Tuner on Facebook and to today I asked a practitioner of the UCC if he was a US citizen. This is his reply:

"No, I am a State National. My trust account is still a "citizen"/"franchise" though. I just used a different process. I have separated my natural self from the trust/franchise and taken the role of Administrator/Executor in it's use. To me, the franchise/trust is a tool, not just a name."

This is the second person to tell me that they were a State National and that they used a different process that utilizes the UCC to establish a state national status.

I've managed to pull a couple of people away from this line of thinking, but, most of these so-called patriots actually think that their rights are somehow derived from and protected by, the UCC. It's all about the UCC to them.

Oh, and by the way, I told him he was IN FACT still a US citizen.

NEWSFLASH: You're all US Citizens, you never renounced your federal citizenship or taken on a special status that makes you Immune to the Federal Government aka IRS. LB Bork's comment:

I have never heard of the maxim, 'You can have your cake and eat it too.'

The Uniform Commercial Code and all the private law these governments establish is predicated on the "citizen and national of the United States" status. You are either that person, or you are not.

What idiocy... That is what happens when the government releases plants to mess up the works.
Now more than ever, we need to separate ourselves from these idiots who buy into this nonsense.

These moronic people will never be part of State Nationals Society.

It says No Homers, we're allowed to have one! Furthermore from LB Bork:

Oh, and it is easy to tell who has stolen the concept of being a national of a state...

As it was I who branded the term "State National". Everyone from idgits, like BrotherB mentioned, to those disinformation artists at Family Guardian have plagiarized it and abused it to the point of confusion. Too bad these people are out there.

Not saying there is not a concept of law behind it...
                  Just saying the principles behind the term was researched and developed by PAC.

Also, it was I that started teaching people that each state is a republic about ten years ago. People like the above mentioned (Family Tardian) and Tim Turner are just disinfo agents/thieves that profit off such things.

Branded the term? Shouldn't it be discovered? You can't brand something that you claim already exists long before you. Otherwise, you might as well admit that the whole thing is an 'invention', or a fabrication to bilk desperate people.

Christ, the hubris in this thread. Moving on...

My case on why RJ should be kicked out of the PAC Alliance (bolding for emphasis):

We ask that you promote the PAC Alliance Program WebRing. We need many people on board networking via the Internet to intensify the strength of the Coalition and the Living Network. Below is the Banner for the WebRing. 

To take part in the PAC Web Ring, we ask that you:

• • Have read and support The Red Amendment
  • Be a member of the Not My Government Forum
  • Not be engaged in unsupported research

To add this feature to your website, blog, etc., go to this link and register and follow the instructions.

• The People's Awareness Coalition Alliance Program WebRing

Godspeed!

Seriously, has LB ever read what RJ is churning out lately? LB really owes it to us - if he's going to hire someone to spam the forum mercilessly, then I demand for some quality control. I want pure PAC posts all the time and nothing else.

Now onto the meat of this field trip: The Not My Government Welcome Visitors thread features some dumb people with dumb opinions explain how they found Pacinlaw.

Remember that post that LB made on my blog about his organization not being racist, because they help/employ black people too? Let me refresh you:

Best posts? Hmmm... Into yourself? LOL No critical thinking from this Guy with No Life who hides behind the Internet, just cut and paste thoughts from Internet searches. Oh, and PAC has black people who work with us. FAIL. PAC material scares him so he has to do this. Poor little weak minded soul. Big loser on this one!

By lb on Judge Leander H. Perez/Communism (24th - 28th ) on 2/26/11

Well, I think I found LB's black friend! Ngone writes:

Greetings Members,

Thanks for the welcome and a special note of thanks to the moderator LeAnn for sharing with me about the Red Amendent, and the invitation to join this forum.

My name is Ngon'e Ada : Aw, I have been studying for quite a few years, and even though I am some what aware of the nature of the problems PAC seeks remedy for, I'm not yet sure if I'm in the right place, I know there is something very wrong with the current political situation in the United States and the world for that matter, but then as I reflect, there was also something wrong in 1776 for many of the people in this Nation. I have had the priviledge of living abroad in Ghana, West Africa, for 3.5 yrs, and that opened my eyes even more. being of African Descent, born in America, I find myself between a rock and a hard place. On one hand being born on this continent, and the other my Ancestors never really being a part of the orignal creation of the Union. So with that said, I am hear to learn and seeking a deep understanding of the issues from different perspectives, one size does not fit all in this circumstance.

I look forward to particaption and learning from the group.

Respectfully,
Ngon'e Aw

Sounds like a Moorish Science Temple of America adherent. In all seriousness, according to the SPLC, there has been a rise in African American sovereign citizen membership. It's weird to joke about it, but like the poor and hideously-in-debt farmers of the 1970's Midwest, African Americans also face the same desperation caused by poverty, and because of this, they are an easy target for sovereign ideology/schemes. (Anecdote: I actually saw an episode of Parking Wars on A&E where a black person used the sovereign citizen defense to ward off the tow truck driver. His car still got towed anyway.)

Chances are, LB (and PAC staff) do provide "services" to African Americans on a greater scale. It would be bad business sense not to. However, this doesn't absolve him of his racist views. We know that he acknowledges faith in Zionist conspiracy theories (RJ especially), and has issues with Islam, and has a hard time reconciling the racist past of his scheme (whitewashing and accusing critics of playing the race card).

Someday, when I get bored with Pacinlaw, I'll make a new blog about ethnically based sovereign citizen scams. It's really a fascinating topic.

Alex writes:

Hello. My name is Alex. I am domiciled in the New Hampshire Republic. The road in front of me looks treacherous but I look forward with anticipation.

In a sense, the vibe I feel is similar to my first day of school when I was a boy. Sure, I feel a bit of apprehension due to the fear of the unknown but, in the same breath, I feel almost giddy with the thoughts of independence floating around inside my head. I know that the only thing I need to fear is fear itself. I am in the correct mindset for this undertaking and I simply need to prepare myself for the journey.

Don't get too attached to these feelings. All of them will come crashing down soon enough.

MoHawka stared into the Abyss, and the Abyss stared back at him:

 Hello everybody.

This is my first visit here and I wanted to get to know the people here and tell a little about myself. To start of with how i got here is a long story but a condensed version I will spill to you all. It all started with the H1N1 propaganda then I could never find the bottom of the rabbit hole. Then the other day I was surfin around on my phone looking at Title 4 says your flag is schwag info and some how came up on this site which seems might be educational/informational, but so far all I can really see is a bunch of propaganda trying to get me to buy some book. But anyway I understand that this false government has taken all our freedoms and has pretended to give us freedom for a very long time and I want to fix it, so I mainly want to get as much info as I can so I know how to proceed properly. And as a side note I have also discovered that our food, water, and air have all been contaminated with fluoride, gmo, and chemtrails (morgellons disease) I know this has noting to do with our sovereignty but I think that theses are all included with the lie because if we knew the ultimate lie the rest will fall apart as well.

Thats all for now I hope to able to help and be help with our cause.

p.s. Then the other day I was surfin around on my phone looking at Title 4 says your flag is schwag info and some how came up on this site which seems might be educational/informational, but so far all I can really see is a bunch of propaganda trying to get me to buy some book. With further review Its not so much propaganda but the necessary first step after first realizing the truth of the 14th Amendment.

Most conspiracy theories are connected to each other such that it's easy to "fall through" them. Unfortunately, whatever critical thinking faculties MoHawka once had were easily defeated by a heaping load of bullshit.

Silver Dave probably came from a more religiously oriented sovereign citizens group.

Shalom Ya'll !!

My name is David and currently live in the nation of Tennessee. I eventually came to this website as a result of searching how to correct my relationship with the governing authorities of this world. If you want to learn to live by the Creators perfect law rather than the laws of men, I believe you have arrived at the right place to start that education process.

This comes with a warning though: If youre looking for a quick fix or wish to remain ignorant, you'll be disappointed. There's a lot to learn and I still have a long way to go, myself.

First of all, read the "red amendment. It's tough, but it's worth it. Second, dedicate yourself to an ongoing education and don't give up. Anything worthwhile comes with a price but with the Father, all things are possible.

I welcome you and hope to see more of ya
David G  

BetaTestVictim wins the Ironic post/username combo.

Hey all!!

Been a member for about 6 months. Am trying to wrap my brain around issues involved with becoming a State National. Hope to one day take the "big step". I have not read The Red Amendment yet. I have it started...it makes my brain hurt. I think it's much like working out in a gym. You have to build yourself up a bit to handle the heavy stuff. I'm getting there. DL'd a Blacks Law dictionary the other day to help me out. I think I'll be ordering a hard copy of the dictionary soon.

I have, in the last 3 months or so, joined Facebook. Provided some folks the PAC link.

I was pleased to be able to pass it on.

Thanks LB for all your work!!

What a strangely stupid, yet accurate post.

 farmerpm writes:

Good morning to you all in the PAC community! I am NEW NEW NEW to this posting business...So I hope I catch on quicker than my first attempt here! I watched the Deprogramming video which led me to look more through the site and listen to the radio interview with LB Bork which led me to my very first attempt at signing up for this...what do I call it?...a blog? See how NEW I am to all of this? Oye!! So, suffice it to say that I am very excited to continue on this journey of awakening and gaining back all of the years of being dumbed down by society, media, and the educational system. Thanks for allowing me into the fold.

I guess that "Deprogramming video" (aka The Matrix trailer) is effective. Who would have thunk it?

This next user, eastcoastwesty, is a victim of the early Craigslist bos /pol/ spam effort (Nov. 23, 2010). I don't know how well my containment policy is working now, but I take one loss very seriously. My first few CL posts weren't all that effective.

Good Day All,

What lead me to the PAC educational sites was a posting that I happened across while doing a job search on CraigsList. I am not sure who wrote that post, but it got me thinking again about issues that I had buried back in my mind 15 years earlier.

In sadness and disbelief, I watched what happened at both Ruby Ridge and Waco unfold on my TV. Those atrocities got me motivated for obtaining my REAL education about what the US Government had become. Scouring the internet for hours on end, reading more books than I ever had in school, I began to realize that I wanted no part in what I thought was MY government. So my personal answer was to "drop out" of the system in all ways I could think of. My only problem was that I had not realized how many different (and ingenious) anchors that this US federal system had me tied to - that is until I read the Red Amendment!

Since finding that CraigsList posting, I have read LB's book, logged many hours on the various PAC sites and have started my status change to become a State National from the great Country of Massachusetts - a Mass National!

Thank you LB, for both finding the right path AND showing us the way.

william wallace writes:

Hello everyone William Wallace here,

I'm very excited to get to know everyone.

I stumbled across the link on The Daily Paul while doing some research on another movement out there. A disinformation movement I'll add.

I've been studying this kind of stuff for about 25yrs. now. Everything I had studied up until this time was never complete. It just seemed like bits and pieces of a much bigger puzzle. I hope I've found a home where I can rest from all the disinformation and learn what's really going on.

William Wallace - Freedom !!!!! 

In the same vein, The Daily Paul is another one of RJ's stomping grounds. The difference being is that I don't have the time to police every right wing website, hence my blog's existence.

Patriot1776Freedom is either a funny troll, or a dumbass:

Hello, I'm from Spring Hill, Florida, and going to run for office for the first time. 

Jerry: Then why are you here?

LB Bork: That is what I thought  

Well, that's it folks. By posting this, I have released myself from ever having to visit that forum ever again.