Like all good beginnings, let's start with the first ever and oft noted PACinlaw document - Human Resources Discussed. The version number of this document is [v.042311], and it is the latest version. I also have an older version of the document that I downloaded from the website two months before, version [v.042406] - it is one page, and does not have footnotes or footers, but the first page is essentially the same as the new one.
.jpeg snapshot of Human Resources Discussed [v.042406] (click to enlarge):
.jpeg snapshot of Human Resources Discussed [v.042311] (click to enlarge):
Plain text dump of [v.042311]:
Page 2HUMAN RESOURCE DISCUSSED© Authored by PAC info@pacinlaw.orgAn Awareness Issue
THOUGHT OF THE DAY FROM A LEGAL RESEARCHER. . . THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME:
One should question why People who are working for “corporations” have not protested the changing of “Personnel Department” to “Human Resource Department”.
The title of “Human Resource” is degrading. Why was the title changed?
Can't these people see that this new classification is saying:
We are using you; We own you, you are our property; We see you as nothing more than a tree (e.g. natural resource) that we pluck from the earth that we use for our profit and gain.
HUMAN RESOURCE is language of the U.N. (United Nations). See their minute entries for the proof of this. Moreover, it is used by the federal and state governments.
This is just a sample of what is in store for the future of mankind of which has been arrogantly slipped in under your nose. The arrogant message is:
You are in servitude to the New Master: the Corporate State... The New World OrderWake up people! The indoctrination damage must be reversed!
The question is All You Zombies: 1 Got gods, or God?
- Learn more by reading the Covenants of the Gods by Gregory Williams. Also see, Historical Error.2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Authored by the People’s Awareness Coalition POB 313 – Kieler, Wisconsin www.pacinlaw.org PAC may be reached via email at: info@pacinlaw.org1 A zombie is a person in an entranced state believed to be controlled by a wizard. Hmmm... What's with those judges' outfits?
2 Respectively, these papers may be found at the following links : www.pacinlaw.org/gods & www.pacinlaw.org/error
People’s Awareness Coalitionpacinlaw.orgDownload more information at www.pacinlaw.org/hr[v.042311]
People's Awareness Coalition Welcomes You
The Coalition has been separating the wheat from the chaff since 1998. Our primary goal is to assist the people of America in gaining back their freedoms under the pre14th Amendment style law system.
Our latest program is entitled the Island Makers Project. The purpose of this project is to provide an understanding of who is dividing people by various means which keeps us in the maintainers' servitude.
Please join us in appropriating education and freedom that the republics provide!Visit People's Awareness Coalition at : www.pacinlaw.orgJoin us at the Not My Government forum :www.notmygovernment.us/forum
The Rightful System of Law
Below is the description of the “Common Law” system compared to the “Natural Person” system:
- COMMON LAW. As distinguished from statutory law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs. It consists of those principles, usage and rules of action applicable to government and security of persons and property which do not rest for their authority upon any express and positive declaration of the will of the legislature. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition
Beware the Maintainers are Deceivers
A tool of maintaining the system is deception. People should be particularly careful when listening to most lawyers and attorneys. These “maintainers” of the system practice a thing called sophistry. Sophism, in its modern definition from Plato, is noted as a specious argument used for deceiving someone.
QUI VULT DECIPI, DECIPIATUR. Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived.That ancient maxim of law is used by all maintainers, be they attorneys, agent provocateurs, etc.
Island Makers Project LexiconA glossary (lexicon) of the terms used in the Island Makers Project may be viewed at the following:
- www.islandmakers.us/lexicon
Also download a PDF version of the IMP Lexicon at the following location on the web:
- www.islandmakers.us/implex
People's Awareness Coalition • 2 | Page
Description: Human Resources Being Evil.
Keywords: "Human Resources", "Human Capital".
Comments: Thanks for the insight on this God.
The full text dump ended up being a messy dump, so I used blockquote and bulleted list to shape it into something readable.
Notice the difference between the two documents, The earlier document uses Times New Roman for the body and Arial in the footer, while the new document uses Calibri font for the original text, and Times New Roman/Arial after the original message.
Original Message.
LB Bork is the original author of this message. According to his interview with Alfred Adask on the American Independence Hour, he emailed this to everyone he could think of in 1999 ("thousands of people"). It eventually became the basis for the People's Awareness Coalition a short while later.
It's a brief message, and a strong foreshadowing of LB Bork's madness. To him, there is a major difference between personnel department and human resources department, and the evilness behind it can easily be traced back to UN, which controls the US. Whether or not the UN itself is the primary source of the New World Order, or simply an apparatus devised by a secretive cabal, has yet to be understood.
The most glaring problem is that he has no evidence of such a plot, nor does he try to point the reader in the right direction (like citing sources). A deep search into the UN Charter reveals no instances of the terms 'human resources', 'personnel', 'new world order', 'illuminati', or any other conspiracy theory. Furthermore, the 'language' of the charter does not contain any instances of some corporation or apparatus oppressing or exploiting people. Wherever LB Bork gets his facts, it is definitely not from any UN publication, or an UN insider, and I'm open to reviewing any sources that LB Bork wishes to provide as long as they're not his.
Any teen that has learned of the Scientific Method in science class can pick apart Bork's reasoning.
From this perspective, we can see that LB Bork's document really consists of half-baked ideas strung together in an illogical (and unscientific) manner. It is painfully obvious that Bork is starting from a conclusion, that 'human resources' are a tell tale sign of the coming New World Order, and that he uses his feelings and anecdotal snippets in an attempt to support it, rather than allowing his research/experimentation to logically go wherever it may take him. Bork even commands us to do the research ourselves, which not only is it pointless piece of non-evidence, but an act of deflection. It's not our job to do Bork's research, and any example of deflection is an automatic disqualification of claim.
It's rather ironic that LB Bork rails against Sophistry, and yet appears to be practicing his preferred definition of it in his first public document. Perhaps he doesn't realize that we skeptics see this document as one big bluff?
New Additions
Putting that embarrassing-to-read footnote aside, it's perplexing to think about what all of this has to do with human resources. Surely it will reveal itself, but when?
Page two is not too different from the postscript of other PACinlaw documents. It contains a mission statement, a sales-pitch, a "useful" definition of a "related" terminology, a PSA about some ongoing evil that plagues society, and links to help further educate whomever happens to be reading. What's bothersome about it is that it makes the document more confusing, especially considering that the second page isn't terribly relevant.
Keywords: "Human Resources", "Human Capital".
Comments: Thanks for the insight on this God.
The full text dump ended up being a messy dump, so I used blockquote and bulleted list to shape it into something readable.
Notice the difference between the two documents, The earlier document uses Times New Roman for the body and Arial in the footer, while the new document uses Calibri font for the original text, and Times New Roman/Arial after the original message.
Original Message.
Analysis:HUMAN RESOURCE DISCUSSED© Authored by PAC info@pacinlaw.orgAn Awareness Issue
THOUGHT OF THE DAY FROM A LEGAL RESEARCHER. . . THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME:
One should question why People who are working for “corporations” have not protested the changing of “Personnel Department” to “Human Resource Department”.
The title of “Human Resource” is degrading. Why was the title changed?
Can't these people see that this new classification is saying:
We are using you; We own you, you are our property; We see you as nothing more than a tree (e.g. natural resource) that we pluck from the earth that we use for our profit and gain.
HUMAN RESOURCE is language of the U.N. (United Nations). See their minute entries for the proof of this. Moreover, it is used by the federal and state governments.
This is just a sample of what is in store for the future of mankind of which has been arrogantly slipped in under your nose. The arrogant message is:
You are in servitude to the New Master: the Corporate State... The New World OrderWake up people! The indoctrination damage must be reversed!
LB Bork is the original author of this message. According to his interview with Alfred Adask on the American Independence Hour, he emailed this to everyone he could think of in 1999 ("thousands of people"). It eventually became the basis for the People's Awareness Coalition a short while later.
It's a brief message, and a strong foreshadowing of LB Bork's madness. To him, there is a major difference between personnel department and human resources department, and the evilness behind it can easily be traced back to UN, which controls the US. Whether or not the UN itself is the primary source of the New World Order, or simply an apparatus devised by a secretive cabal, has yet to be understood.
The most glaring problem is that he has no evidence of such a plot, nor does he try to point the reader in the right direction (like citing sources). A deep search into the UN Charter reveals no instances of the terms 'human resources', 'personnel', 'new world order', 'illuminati', or any other conspiracy theory. Furthermore, the 'language' of the charter does not contain any instances of some corporation or apparatus oppressing or exploiting people. Wherever LB Bork gets his facts, it is definitely not from any UN publication, or an UN insider, and I'm open to reviewing any sources that LB Bork wishes to provide as long as they're not his.
Any teen that has learned of the Scientific Method in science class can pick apart Bork's reasoning.
- Observation - the change of title from 'personnel department' to 'human resources.'
- Hypothesis - 'Human resources' is a degrading term designed to exert corporate/gov't control.
- Prediction - 'Human resources' is a sign of the coming "New World Order" - an authoritarian gov't bent on enslaving people and nations of the world.
- Experimentation - none at all. He could have done a few things. 1) provided line by line analysis of relevant Government and UN documents and publications. 2) He could have done a survey of worker morale of 20 companies that have 'human resources', and another survey of 20 companies that have 'personnel department'. There should be a control of 20 or so companies that do not use either terminology, and the companies worthy of study should be 25 people strong (includes all people in the company - boss, managers, workers).
- Analysis - Same as hypothesis. Ideally it should be a statistical analysis of morale.
- Conclusion - Same as prediction. Is HR more demeaning than PD? Is HR really part of NWO?
- Retest - Very important. If he took his thoughts seriously, others would take him more seriously.
- Publish - Bork's favorite step :-)
From this perspective, we can see that LB Bork's document really consists of half-baked ideas strung together in an illogical (and unscientific) manner. It is painfully obvious that Bork is starting from a conclusion, that 'human resources' are a tell tale sign of the coming New World Order, and that he uses his feelings and anecdotal snippets in an attempt to support it, rather than allowing his research/experimentation to logically go wherever it may take him. Bork even commands us to do the research ourselves, which not only is it pointless piece of non-evidence, but an act of deflection. It's not our job to do Bork's research, and any example of deflection is an automatic disqualification of claim.
It's rather ironic that LB Bork rails against Sophistry, and yet appears to be practicing his preferred definition of it in his first public document. Perhaps he doesn't realize that we skeptics see this document as one big bluff?
New Additions
The link "All You Zombies" goes to a song on PACinlaw called All You Zombies by The Hooters. It's not surprising that he would steal an opening keyboard section for a background tune, considering that the rest of his website is based on stolen content (from legal theories to stock photos).The question is All You Zombies: 1 Got gods, or God?
- Learn more by reading the Covenants of the Gods by Gregory Williams. Also see, Historical Error.2
1 A zombie is a person in an entranced state believed to be controlled by a wizard. Hmmm... What's with those judges' outfits?
Putting that embarrassing-to-read footnote aside, it's perplexing to think about what all of this has to do with human resources. Surely it will reveal itself, but when?
Page two is not too different from the postscript of other PACinlaw documents. It contains a mission statement, a sales-pitch, a "useful" definition of a "related" terminology, a PSA about some ongoing evil that plagues society, and links to help further educate whomever happens to be reading. What's bothersome about it is that it makes the document more confusing, especially considering that the second page isn't terribly relevant.
There's quite a few problems with the quote above. First, the "Natural Person" system is not covered at all, and no comparison is made, therefore no one knows what the "Rightful System of Law" truly is. Secondly, it takes much more than sophism in the courtroom. Like countless hours of legal research and proper citation, and effective debating skills.The Rightful System of Law
Below is the description of the “Common Law” system compared to the “Natural Person” system:
- COMMON LAW. As distinguished from statutory law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs. It consists of those principles, usage and rules of action applicable to government and security of persons and property which do not rest for their authority upon any express and positive declaration of the will of the legislature. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition
Beware the Maintainers are Deceivers
A tool of maintaining the system is deception. People should be particularly careful when listening to most lawyers and attorneys. These “maintainers” of the system practice a thing called sophistry. Sophism, in its modern definition from Plato, is noted as a specious argument used for deceiving someone.
QUI VULT DECIPI, DECIPIATUR. Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived.That ancient maxim of law is used by all maintainers, be they attorneys, agent provocateurs, etc.
The reason for demonizing lawyers and attorneys is obvious. Lawyers and Attorneys have two things, authority, and expertise. LB Bork has neither. So he attacks their authority to elevate himself above them, which comes with the added benefit of misdirection - less people would pay attention to the glaring flaws in his argument such that the net result is more people falling victim to his scam.
And he would have gotten away with it if it weren't for those meddling lawyers.
Web Introduction
The founder the People's Awareness Coalition (PAC), LB Bork, had discovered that the usage of Personnel Department had been changed to Human Resource Department in the corporate world. As Bork was not in this world he found it amazing that people accepted this demeaning title without question. Accordingly PAC was birthed by a writing entitled Human Resource Discussed which goes into the nature of the terminology. In studying law, Bork found that the system of government installed by the founding fathers had been altered to accompany such progressive changes: this birthed PAC Deprogramming.
In the movie the Matrix, a metaphoric example was made: Morpheus explained that people are batteries used to power the machines. At first, Neo refused to believe the truth about his life being a total lie...Morpheus taught Neo how to free his mind.
In relation to deprogramming, it had been found that people may be programmed. John B. Watson, founder of Behaviorism, stated, "Give me a baby and I can make any kind of man." His experiments found that fear in humans is conditioned. From this it was found that the driving force behind society could be that of fear, and not love. The movie "Human Resources" explores why things are the way they are in relation to the findings of Watson. It is time to FREE YOUR MIND...
It's easier to find the document than the webpage that leads up to it. The pompousness is astounding, as if Human Resource Discussed is a massive dissertation worthy of academic critique (the documentary he pinched from someone else is much more deserving). Also fittingly, this further supports how LB Bork is a practitioner of sophistry, the very thing he warns about.
--------------------
Right out of the gate, we can clearly see that LB Bork's scam is based on pathological lies and inept research. It's a house of cards beckoning to be blown over.