Origin of Sovereign Citizens is a 6 page document, current version [v.051911]. I do not know of any earlier version than the current one. Analysis is provided on a page by page basis to preserve readability, with a summary at the end. Very mild use formatting was done on the text dump to make it more readable. The document can be grabbed
here.
And finally, I'm always gathering more information, so expect this document to be expanded later.
F O R E W O R D
Ever since I audited
Human Resources Discussed, I have been struggling to find an appropriate direction to take the Content Audit. There was a definite narrative unfolding in the documents I downloaded so far, so I came up with three ways to best preserve that narrative:
- Chronologically: HRD is the first, move to the next document by date of authorship.
- Linked: The latest HRD links to a few other documents, go for the one that fits best, like Historical Error.
- Perceptually: Going in the order that makes sense to me. For instance, if I were a stranger that walked into PAC Headquarters, what would they try to teach me first? I think they would go easy first, "deprogram" me, sell me more complex stuff, and then reveal their deepest topics. I dub this the Scientology process.
First makes the most sense to me, but it is difficult to ascertain the chronological order of these documents. The second would be great, if the related documents made sense in that order. If one were to click pacinlaw.org/gods in the new HRD, it would go to the NMG forum post that lists even more documents without any motivating summaries. Thanks, but no thanks. To make matters worse, Historical Error is a deeply complex document. Surely there has to be an easier way to jump into this, right? Luckily, there's a link to pacinlaw.org/demons, which brings us to this easier-to-digest document.
T E X T D U M P
P a g e 1
THE ORIGIN OF SOVEREIGN CITIZENS © Authored by PAC info@pacinlaw.org
"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." —Thomas Jefferson
Introduction
The unrest of people in America has been on the rise due to the loss of jobs, homes, and possessions. Adding insult to injury, Americans are also feeling a significant reduction of liberties and more control being exerted on them by those who they believe are protecting them. As a result of this situation, many people have investigated the cause of their plight and discovered a substantial change in government after the Civil War. It has been discovered that after the war citizenship in America changed giving the federal power new centralized control over the people. Most people searching for the truth have honor and are looking for a valid remedy; however there will always be those people who hope to lead honorable people away from the truth for personal gain. To make matters worse, it appears that those factions invested in the deception have labeled all truth-seekers as "Sovereign Citizens" in order to demonize them.
Facts Surrounding Sovereign Citizens
Understanding constitutional law, the 14th Amendment is the direct cause of the so-called the "Sovereign Citizen" movement. This amendment established two distinct things, it: 1) created a dual citizenship on the peoples of the states that pulled them into the control of Congress; 2) extended federal protections to corporations which allowed them to have more power. Accordingly, the amendment caused multiple tools of intrusion to be developed by the legislatures so that people could be controlled by law via the States and the United States. This control included the spawning of several agencies that people are subject to; and again had given corporations equal, or at times, superior power over the people of America.
People's Awareness Coalition and Nationality
For the record, the People's Awareness Coalition (PAC) does not advocate the so-called sovereign citizen position. There are factors of law which are much more precise that we have found that are applicable to the current situation under the 14th Amendment. Taking back the nationalities of our countries over the United States nationality is our immediate remedy for protecting our natural rights under the Constitution.
The Ability To Maintain Control
As the corporate structure benefits immensely from this system under the 14th Amendment, there is a need to keep it in existence. To maintain control of this system, there has to be a multitude of devices used. Race strife is one of the major tools used by the maintainers. The race card emerges when anyone challenges the amendment. Race was the public sales tool used to sell the amendment in the first place. Of course, with a little research one will find it is a farce. Agent Provocateur programs are another method of obfuscation for the benefactors to maintain control of the created empire. Disinformation is established on many fronts for would-be patriots to use and possibly get in legal trouble, or get sent down a wrong path.
People’s Awareness Coalition
pacinlaw.org
Download this six page document at www.pacinlaw.org/demons [v.051911]
The Origin of Sovereign Citizens starts off with an obviously cherry-picked quote from Thomas Jefferson. Here's the whole quote:
And say, finally, whether peace is best preserved by giving energy to the government or information to the people. This last is the most certain and the most legitimate engine of government. Educate and inform the whole mass of the people. Enable them to see that it is their interest to preserve peace and order, and they will preserve them. And it requires no very high degree of education to convince them of this. They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.
--Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1787.
Here's the largest body of
Thomas Jefferson quotes regarding education that I could find on the internet. It's not surprising that LB Bork would ironically misappropriate a quote from a Founding Father, and neuter it's true meaning --
a call for public education for all to secure freedom and liberty from the makings of a tyrannical government. Thomas Jefferson has the '
it' factor, street cred, and name-brand recognition that Bork could never have, no matter how many books or PDF Documents he writes. So Bork tries to cash in on it by opening with an abbreviated Thomas Jefferson quote to make his theories easier to pander to potential marks.
It only takes five minutes of searching to realize the folly in quoting someone who doesn't support Bork's core values. In my opinion, he probably didn't think that anyone would fact check a Thomas Jefferson quote, which explains why he ran with it.
The Introduction makes an emotional appeal, preying on desperate people looking for relief. It's strong enough to net anyone, until he continues that the problems result from a dramatic change in government after the Civil War (
It took them a while... but man, they really caught up! Sorry about your house though...). It's obvious that he's talking about the 14th Amendment, and the secret cabal of government lawyers out to attack him and his cohorts, (rightfully) labeling him a sovereign citizen. You know, the "Maintainters and Deceivers" bit. But even without the paranoia, the introduction makes a
Post Hoc fallacy, such that because the Civil War happened and the 14th Amendment's change of citizenship, it is directly related to today's recession and job losses,
which is simply not true at all.
The Facts Surrounding Sovereign Citizens paragraph makes an interesting claim, that the 14th Amendment caused the Sovereign Citizen movement because it establishes dual citizenship and stronger corporate rights (more than a citizen). Though the reality is that the roots of Sovereign Citizens - specifically LB Bork's variation,
comes from the
racism in response to the Civil Rights movement gaining significant traction using the 14th Amendment positively.
Accordingly, the amendment caused multiple tools of intrusion to be developed by the legislatures so that people could be controlled by law via the States and the United States. This control included the spawning of several agencies that people are subject to; and again had given corporations equal, or at times, superior power over the people of America.
Peculiar statement. "States Rights" argument without states. Which leads to the PAC's stance on (other) sovereign citizen positions; they don't support them. LB Bork claims that he has the true solution, though the reality is that
most sovereign citizen positions have failed in court, so he made up something else. The true goal of his movement is based on Political Theory 101, that more people that join his movement to recreate the antebellum state, the more legitimate that state becomes, and ultimately replacing original post-14th Amendment state. Truly a no finer example of "I'm going to take my own ball and go home."
The ability to maintain deception deflects the true point of the 14th Amendment - equal protection under the law. It is about race, but he uses the race card to deflect it's validity because he does not have an effective argument against it. From this he asserts that the 14th Amendment needs the state to stay alive, but the reality is that the Supreme court has defended the 14th Amendment time and time again, and it can stand for itself. There's really no need to establish a protectionist apparatus, or believe that one exists for that matter.
Ultimately, what makes that paragraph effective is that it explains how he was victimized, and no matter how illegitimate his claim of victimization is, it serves an effective appeal to emotion.
P a g e 2
Accordingly, this serves as a tool of ridicule to demonize anyone that would expose the system. It further creates massive income for the law industry through legal fees, and money for the prison industry.
Distinction between People's Awareness Coalition and Attorneys
The People's Awareness Coalition has the goal in educating people of America in regard to the change of government that took place just after the Civil War. In contraposition in an attempt to educate the people of America, attorneys believe they have a monopoly on the law, wherefore keep their "trade secrets" to themselves. Some have the attitude that their level of intelligence is greater; and accordingly treat anyone who is not in their circle like they are inferior. To protect their monopoly and stream of enormous income, some seek to ridicule and destroy people of America rather than make an attempt to educate them.
The States are Republics
Alexander Hamilton, the main architect of the Constitution for the United States of America, set forth in Federalist Paper number 9 that all the states are republics in the United States federation: “As this government is composed of small republics, it enjoys the internal happiness of each.” These several republics have their own nationality and citizenship; but they have been interfered with by the United States and its 14th Amendment and legislation. The subversive system operates off something called cooperative federalism. There are other words for this that obfuscate the actual political plan: the common one being termed "Democracy". The blueprint for its operation was drafted by Karl Marx.
14th Amendment creates De facto system
Having an alternate political system creates if not a new, but alternate, governmental system. Due to that fact that a new "political body" was created by the "national" or "federal" citizenship, the governmental system under the 14th Amendment is "de facto". To create a whole new system, a different constitution would have to have been installed. In defining a de facto government, the following citation illustrates: de facto government. A new government which exercises undisputed sway over the entire country, the former established government having been nullified by successful rebellion or having lost the support of the people. A de facto government arises where the established government has been subverted by rebellion, so that the new government exercises undisputed sway for the time being over the entire country, or where the people of any portion of a country subject to the same government throw off their allegiance to that government and establish one of their own, and show not only that they have established a government, but also their ability to maintain it. —Am J Rev ed Internat L § 12 (International Law)
A most important statement should be noted in that cite: "...but also their ability to maintain it." Understanding that citizenship determines the political affiliations that governs a state or country, people have thrown-off their fidelity or "allegiance" to the lawful political system of the Constitution. Instead they have opted for a political and legal system that is created by the United States' 14th Amendment. The rightful or "de jure" law principles must be recognized or else it would not be a de facto government. Like a parasite, this alternate system has attached itself to the Constitution and uses its blood, thus goes undetected. The demonized "sovereign citizens" strive to be a part of the rightful or de jure system. Herein we have briefly gone over how they "maintain" this alternate system : attorneys, fear, ignorance, and disinformation on multiple levels (established by multi-national corporations), are all major tools.
The Origin of Sovereign Citizens People's Awareness Coalition • 2 | Page
The Distinction between PAC and attorneys.
This paragraph should only be read one way:
we're not attorneys, nor did we ever attend law school. But we'd love to be attorneys. If only they'd let us in... :-(. It's an emotional appeal designed to strike fear and contempt for everyone in the legal profession. Note the stereotyping of lawyers being an exclusive club of condescending jerks out to screw decent God fearing people. We all know that they're decent lawyers out there working to provide the best representation of their client, or provide advice and other useful services, and LB Bork acknowledges this by hedging his statement with "some."
The States are Republics.
Full text of Federalist Papers #9
here. Full quote:
"As this government is composed of small republics, it enjoys the internal happiness of each; and with respect to its external situation, it is possessed, by means of the association, of all the advantages of large monarchies.''
The problem with Bork's argument is that Hamilton never said that each state is a nation unto itself. Furthermore:
The definition of a CONFEDERATE REPUBLIC seems simply to be "an assemblage of societies,'' or an association of two or more states into one state. The extent, modifications, and objects of the federal authority are mere matters of discretion. So long as the separate organization of the members be not abolished; so long as it exists, by a constitutional necessity, for local purposes; though it should be in perfect subordination to the general authority of the union, it would still be, in fact and in theory, an association of states, or a confederacy. The proposed Constitution, so far from implying an abolition of the State governments, makes them constituent parts of the national sovereignty, by allowing them a direct representation in the Senate, and leaves in their possession certain exclusive and very important portions of sovereign power. This fully corresponds, in every rational import of the terms, with the idea of a federal government.
Remember, the Federalist Papers are not the Constitution. Hamilton is trying to make a sale here, so he's trying to assuage people of their fears that their state would no longer exist. A government composed of small republics is an apt sales point regarding the structure of the state, exacting accuracy be damned. To conclude, Bork's understanding of Federalist #9 is a complete fabrication. (Personally, I wouldn't be too surprised if his method of research is to make a printout of whatever he was researching, pinning it up against a bulletin board, and throwing darts at it. If a dart hit a word, he would just run with the sentence it belonged to and make it work.)
The second part of the paragraph isn't much better. The biggest interference that the 14th Amendment caused is that it stopped formerly Confederate States from passing more black codes, and other laws designed to enslave black people via imprisonment (though it didn't stop the coming of Jim Crow, unfortunately). And to say that democracy is part of Karl Marx's blueprint, such that democracy is a stepping stone towards Communism, is a
slippery slope fallacy.
14th Amendment Creates a De Facto System.
Dense hodgepodge of emotional fantasy and unsupported legal theory. Basically it claims that the pre-civil War states are de jure (by law), and the 14th Amendment made it a
de facto vampire. It's based on the fact that Southern States were reneging on their agreements
post Civil War and creating an underground system of slavery, forcing the Radical Republicans in Congress to pass rigorous standards (Reconstruction acts, 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments) that Southern States had to meet before reentering the Union.
To Bork, this is a massive power grab that Congress had no right in doing, such that the laws and amendments passed and instituted by this grab are null and void because they were not the will of the people - of course discounting the Election of 1866 that gave Radical Republicans full control of Senate and House.
Not those people, he means God fearing Confederates! And the 13th amendment did contain language that states that congress may enforce the law appropriately. And Civil rights act of 1866 hinted towards. And the court case Texas v. White (1869) that states that seceding states never had the right to secede.
The legal fiction that the 14th Amendment turned states into de facto vampires while the original state still exists secretly underneath sounds suspiciously lifted from
Redemption theory. The Redemption theory claimed that every person is bound to a strawman (fictitious person, spelt in capital letters) that is also an account containing $630,000 of collateral. Through obscure paperwork in different ink sent in a specific order, one can free themselves from their strawman (thus freeing themselves from authority), and collect from the account.
The 14th Amendment state is like the strawman, and the "lawful government" is the real name that legally frees one from the 14th Amendment state. Because somehow the "lawful government" is so much better.
P a g e 3
Authorities in Support
Now to provide some evidence that illustrates the change of citizenship and installs the system of federal private law that treats people as "legal entities". If you have trouble understanding the following, maybe a friend who is a lawyer can assist you in an explanation. If he is a man of God he would be willing.
Authorities in support of political change:
De jure Citizen(s) Reference : “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the acts heretofore passed on that subject. Approved April 14, 1802. Section 1. Be it enacted, &c, That any alien ... may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them..." The verbiage noted as "..., or any of them" shows that there were "citizens" of each state that are or were distinct from a so-called "national", "federal", or "citizen of the United States" citizenship. The Intent of the 14th Amendment : "We intend to make citizenship National. Heretofore, a man has been a citizen of the United States because he was a citizen of some-one of the States: now, we propose to reverse that, and make him a citizen of any State where he chooses to reside, by defining in advance his National citizenship—and our Amendment declares that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” Page 64, The Reconstruction Problem, speech of James Blaine, Skowhegan, Maine (August 29, 1866) Disenfranchisement of De jure Citizens : Dyett v. Turner, 439 P2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403 (1968). Also see Section 2 of the 14th Amendment which causes the actual "rebellion" by an operation of law and the disenfranchisement of the lawful citizens of the several republics in the Union. Download the paper "Historical Error" on the disenfranchisement subject : www.pacinlaw.org/error
Interestingly enough, there is a doctrine or practice—if you will—that allows the courts of America to not hear political questions. This allows the system to sustain itself with the help of the "maintainers". People who are voting, silent, and taking benefits are the ones who consent to be governed by it.
Authorities in support of legal change:
Instead of people being men and women and subject only to public law, they are "legal entities" under the 14th Amendment United States person status, thus "controlled" by the legislatures in all respects:
CITIZEN OF A STATE: A citizen of the United States, residing in any state of the Union; Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. See citizens resident in the state. CITIZENS RESIDENT IN THE STATE: NATURAL PERSONS who are citizens and residents, and CORPORATIONS chartered in the State. —Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, Third Edition
Excerpts from The Institutes of Roman Law, by Rudolph Sohm (1892), the Law of Persons:
The jus privatum was throughout a law for the individual only, and hence—as far as the old private law of Rome was concerned—there could be no subject of rights and duties other than a natural person, i.e. an individual. Roman private law had originally no room for
The Origin of Sovereign Citizens People's Awareness Coalition • 3 | Page
Authorities in Support
How treating people like they're legal entities is a
bad thing, I don't know. LB Bork must be using his own definition of it, and couldn't be bothered to add it into his islandmakers.us/lexicon page.
Authorities in Support of Political Change
De jure Citizen(s) Reference : “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the acts heretofore passed on that subject. Approved April 14, 1802. Section 1. Be it enacted, &c, That any alien ... may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them..." The verbiage noted as "..., or any of them" shows that there were "citizens" of each state that are or were distinct from a so-called "national", "federal", or "citizen of the United States" citizenship.
The cite in question comes from the Naturalization Law of 1802. Relevant section:
3.-1. An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the acts heretofore passed on that subject. Approved April 14, 1802. 7 Hill, 137.
Sec. 1. Be it enacted, &c, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on the following conditions, and not otherwise: First, That be shall have declared, on oath or affirmation, before the supreme, superior, district, or circuit court, of some one of the states, or of the territorial districts of the United States, or a circuit or district court of the United States, three years at least before his admission, that it was, bona fide, his intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whatever, and particularly, by name, the prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, whereof such alien may, at the time, be a citizen or subject. Secondly, That he shall, at the time of his application to be admitted, declare, on oath or affirmation, before some one of the courts aforesaid, that he will support the constitution of the United States, and that he doth absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whatever, and particularly, by name, the prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, whereof he was before a citizen or subject; which proceedings shall be recorded by the clerk of the court. Thirdly, That the court admitting such alien shall be satisfied that he has resided within the United States five years, at least, and within the state or territory where such court is at the time held, one year at least; and it shall further appear to their satisfaction, that, during that time, he has behaved as a man of good moral character, attached to the principles of the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same:
"or any of them" does not support the claim that states are their own separate countries. More importantly, the 14th Amendment does not make citizenship "national", it extends equal protections under the law to the state level.
I'll save that disenfranchisement claim for Historical Error.
The Supreme Court has never heard political questions, ever, since it's inception. Their realm is law only.
Authorities in Support of Legal Change
Bork is being glib about legal entities once again. and supports it with an irrelevant entry from Ballentines Law Dictionary, 3rd ed, and an irrelevant excerpts from Institutes of Roman Law. The purpose is to claim that the other, secret intent of the 14th Amendment is to make corporations like people, but it's not true. Corporate personhood as we know it came from Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, thus making his conclusion on page 4 utterly flawed.
P a g e 4
gigantic corporate personalities so vastly exceeding the dimensions of the individual personality. Originally, it was neither capable not desirous of supplying the law for any other proprietary relations but those of private persons in the strictest sense of the term, i.e. individual persons. Nevertheless the Roman lawyers succeeded, as we have seen, in securing the recognition of corporations within the domain of private law.
So you see, lawyers of America had done the same thing to the peoples of the republics of the Union that lawyers did to the people of Rome. The 14th Amendment empowers corporations with property rights and protections just as if they were people. This was the true purpose of the Civil War.
The Rightful System of Law:
Below is the description of the "Common Law" system compared to the "Natural Person" system: COMMON LAW. As distinguished from statutory law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs. It consists of those principles, usage and rules of action applicable to government and security of persons and property which do not rest for their authority upon any express and positive declaration of the will of the legislature. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition
So you see, people can live in their republics and not be in "The State" (14th Amendment States).
Beware the Maintainers are Deceivers
A tool of maintaining the system is deception. People should be particularly careful when listening to most lawyers and attorneys. These "maintainers" of the system practice a thing called sophistry. Sophism, in its modern definition from Plato, is noted as a specious argument used for deceiving someone. QUI VULT DECIPI, DECIPIATUR. Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived. That ancient maxim of law is used by all maintainers, be they attorneys, agent provocateurs, etc.
People's Awareness Coalition Welcomes You
The Coalition has been separating the wheat from the chaff since 1998. Our primary goal is to assist the people of America in gaining back their freedoms under the pre14th Amendment style law system.
Our latest program is entitled the Island Makers Project. The purpose of this project is to provide an understanding of who is dividing people by various means which keeps us in the maintainers' servitude.
Please join us in appropriating education and freedom that the republics provide!
The Origin of Sovereign Citizens People's Awareness Coalition • 4 | Page
You have probably seen the rest of this page from the
Human Resources Discussed audit. Same argument applies, I have yet to see how Bork defines "Natural Persons' system." (I'm only interested in his, not someone else's).
P a g e 5
Island Makers Project Lexicon
A glossary (lexicon) of the terms used in the Island Makers Project may be viewed at the following:
www.islandmakers.us/lexicon
Also download a PDF version of the IMP Lexicon at the following location on the web:
www.islandmakers.us/implex
The Problem is in the Mirror
As covered above, the persons who benefit off this system maintain control through various means. Be it compartmentalization through education, religious strife, race division, deception, power, the list goes on.
The justice of this court understood the problem that we ultimately face:
The chief enemies of republican freedom are mental sloth, conformity, bigotry, superstition, credulity, monopoly in the market of ideas, and utter benighted ignorance. —Citing Justice Black in Adderley v. State of Florida (1967)
So, hopefully you can now visualize the problem with your lack of freedom. That aside, the maintainers have an interest of keeping you in servitude so they can appropriate your wealth with their system. Also, understand that there are more of us then there is of them, so the battle we face can be won with unity.
Entities Maintaining Control
We have provided a short list of some of the active individuals or organizations that maintain control:
Short List of Perpetrators: Attorneys/Professionals Maintaining the System : Quatloos : http:// www.quatloos.com Owner, Jay Adkisson : http://www.jayadkisson.com Red Crayons : http://www.redcrayons.net Owner, JJ MacNab : http://www.deathandtaxes.com Daniel Evans : http:// www.evans-legal.com
Organizations Playing the Race Card: Southern Poverty Law Center : http://www.splcenter.org The Anti-Defamation League : http://www.adl.org
Propaganda Machine Tactics : The Ad Council : http://www.adcouncil.org
The Origin of Sovereign Citizens People's Awareness Coalition • 5 | Page
Adderly v. State of Florida (1967) is about state property not always being public property - in this case, a prison is not public property and therefore not an appropriate place to protest. LB Bork is quoting a footnote, reproduced below:
[ Footnote 1 ] "Where would we really find the principal danger to civil liberty in a republic? Not in the governors as governors, not in the governed as governed, but in the governed unequipped to function as governors. The chief enemies of republican freedom are mental sloth, conformity, bigotry, superstition, credulity, monopoly in the market of ideas, and utter, benighted ignorance. Relying as it does on the consent of the governed, representative government cannot succeed unless the community receives enough information to grasp public issues and make sensible decisions. As lights which may have been enough for the past do not meet the needs of the present, so present lights will not suffice for the more extensive and complex problems of the future. Heretofore public enlightenment may have been only a manifest desideratum; today it constitutes an imperative necessity. The First Amendment, says Justice Black, `reflects the faith that a good society is not static but advancing, and that the fullest possible interchange of ideas and beliefs is essential to attainment of this goal.' [From Feldman v. United States, 322 U.S. 487, 501 (dissenting opinion).]" Cahn, supra, at 102.
It's a good quote, and it had bearing on Justice Black's feelings, but it doesn't change the ruling. Why Bork picked it has yet to be understood fully, other than help make Bork's argument appear more 'cultured' and 'less repetitive'.
Enemies Maintaining Control
Let's face it, anybody who critically questions Bork is an enemy. We're all 'maintainers and deceivers.' But after reading this document, perhaps he's the one that needs to take a look in the mirror.
P a g e 6
Other People Exposing the Problem
You may find this list helpful in further understanding the problems that we face:
People Exposing the Legal Demons : Douglas Rushkoff : http://www.rushkoff.com
People Exposing DeEducation : Charlotte Iserbyt : http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com John Taylor Gatto : http://www.johntaylorgatto.com
NOTE: These two lists will grow. Updates are available at : www.pacinlaw.org/demons
NOTE: Updates are available in the form of PDF, this PDF being the latest. Not exactly an expansive list of intellectual allies.
M E T A D A T A
Author: LB Bork lb@pacinlaw.org
Subject: Sovereign Citizen Movement
Keywords: "Sovereign Citizen, Origin of Sovereign Citizens, Defining Sovereign Citizens, Sovereign Citizen Movement, Defining Sovereign Citizens, What is a Sovereign Citizens, Fourteenth Amendment, Common Law, LB Bork, PAC, People's Awareness Coalition, Demonize, Extremism, JJ MacNab, Red Crayon, Southern Poverty Law Center, Freedom Movement, The Red Amendment, What Are Sovereign Citizens, Maintainers. "
Category: Government & Politics
Comments: I would like to thank JJ MacNab for creating the impetus of this paper
SourceModified: D20110520175049
Regarding comments entry:
Ohhh word, B? Is this because she took one look at your website and wrote you off as a sovereign citizen?
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y
Origin of Sovereign Citizens is a deliberately deceptive piece, using mostly emotional appeals and logical fallacies to create a sense of
Us vs. Them, 'them' being a part of one great conspiracy in keeping people as slaves to the 14th Amendment. His legal theories
thus far are fiction, and have no merit. However, he has written extensively on the 14th Amendment, so it will be interesting to see just how consistent his argument is over the next few documents.
His inability to cite his sources correctly is especially troubling, as LB Bork distorts his sources content and relevancy on a regular basis throughout this document. Too many people might take his claims at face value without doing any real research of their own.
Hello everybody.
