Welp, it just keeps coming (55th CL post)

Current: I just noticed that LB Bork is a follower of mine. Oh Wooooorrrrrddddd, B?

Also, I noticed that there's a lull in PACINLAW grade posting over at Craigslist. Which is great, those posts are retarded.

Back to regularly scheduled programming:
------------------------------------------

That 14th Amendment post is like an itch that you can't scratch - the syphilis of /pol/ nationwide.

2211810409   Feb 12 11 08:07:28 PM   bos   politics   Re: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT Cont . . (Involuntary Servitude) 

Federal citizenship is not voluntary. If you are a citizen of a state, you are a federal citizen. You can't have one without the other, it has never been interpreted that one can only be a state citizen. Stop making shit up. Pertinent information here: Tax Protester FAQ, written by a real lawyer with a real education: http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html. Regarding the 14th Amendment here http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html#sovereigncitizens.

Game Over. Pack your shit up and hit the bricks.

Every argument you make is in the FAQ. Read it and weep, bitch. In fact, I fucking dare you to read the FAQ, because I know that you'd rather skip it and keep spamming your plagiarized bullshit. That's right, you're a plagiarist - a cheater. You probably don't even know what any of these terms even mean, you just wait until someone tells you what you want to hear, and believe it 100%. Why don't you rub your two braincells and come up with an original idea, you fucking failure.

"Gold fringe on a flag = military flag" is the most retarded argument possible. The rest is just you blowing smoke up people's asses. The South lost, get over it. Crybaby.

IN CONCLUSION: You are a stupid unoriginal shit. Your theories will not protect you from the IRS, and you will pay your taxes, or you will go to jail.

-Somerville Lesbian #666.

-----------------

THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

It is of common knowledge that after the American Civil War (so-called) the Union went through some dramatic changes. Among these changes was a dominant makeover of the Union’s constitutional system. Such changes included amendments to be made to the Federal Constitution, commonly known as the Reconstruction Amendments; they are the 13th, 14th and 15th. As the people of America have been taught, they believe that the purpose of these amendments were of purpose to administer civil rights to the freed slaves. All such amendments have apparently seemed to serve such purpose; however, such measures have eroded the proper ‘civic law’ of America: the common law.

Consequently, over the past 130+ years, such civil law has been destroyed and has been tacitly transferred to the police power of the federal and state governments. This has been implicitly accomplished by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment; of and which such operation of law is set forth: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This clause is referred to as the “naturalization clause”.13 In legal operation, it collectively naturalizes everyone one born in America to be federal citizens at birth; however, such de facto citizenship is voluntary. It must be established that the Fourteenth Amendment citizenship develops a character that is fully repugnant to natural and international law. In fact, said amendment induced a commercial based constitutional system of law; that is to say everything that is encompassed in the governmental de facto system is of a contractual or commercial nature. This imports the creation of legal fictions and also creates several conflicts of law. Another repugnant factor that coexists with this citizenship de facto is the unnatural allegiance to the “United States” that is imposed.

Accordingly, Americans do not realize that they have given up their liberties by not expressly terminating the de facto citizenship at their age of majority; moreover, they further consent (in a tacit agreement) to the induced constitutional system and unnatural franchised citizenship by voting; such being set-up under the operations of law under Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Conformably, said section of the amendment further establishes the “new apportionment” of federal representation, amongst the states of the Union, and also sets-up the “new, or rather, alternate” state governments. Such governments are referred to as de facto.18 As Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment somewhat preserves the original citizenships, all the law that is established under the Fourteenth Amendment is effectively private law in regard to U.S. citizens; hence, the states, and federal government, only represent voting federal citizens, and the ones that have not claimed their rightful nationalities. Consequently, this is where the dual system of law is created:

1) The private law that is caused by the Fourteenth Amendment; and,


2) The public law that is inherent in the original form of the American constitutional system, which includes—as nothing has been repealed—the public law of each state—which is encompassed in their respective constitutions—and the public law that is set forth by the original form (organic) of the Constitution for the United States of America.

To further illustrate the establishment of the dual system of law, we must undertake what has truly transpired in relation to Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment:

On the foundations that are set forth by the law of nations (and the alternate Thirteenth Amendment),20 one cannot lawfully be subordinate to the “dominion” of another without his consent;21 accordingly, using syntax—or sentence diagramming—you will find the following in Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment set forth in stealth:

“...the right to vote... is denied... except for participation in rebellion, or other crime.”

In essence, what this accomplishes is an unwitting contractual agreement by a denizened citizen of the United States (federal citizen) to unwittingly give-up his de jure law form and accept the de facto law form, which is in essence the police power of the federal and state legislatures, i.e. voluntary servitude; such as being established by the diabolical 14th Amendment political system. In reference to said system, the state legislatures are acting in a quasi-war mode due to the induced voting rebellion, i.e. police state. An American is in breach of allegiance to his native state by unwittingly declaring that he accepts this alternate governmental system; he is then controlled by statutory law at the whim of the state and federal governments over his de jure law form, which is the common law. All such citizens are considered belligerents; the nationals that run the state governments de facto are deemed factions or insurgents;18 in rudimentary form of the constitutional system of the American union, the legislatures could not create private law that affected “citizens” at large, i.e. so-called Public Law. Also, one can observe that some law established by the statutory scheme is pursuant to international rules of war.

As the law as applied is fundamentally followed, the general constitutional provisions that have been craftily utilized to create this ‘quiet war’ can be found in the body of the original Constitution in Article IV, section 4: “The United States shall. . . protect each of them (several states) against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive, against domestic Violence.” The problem is the states in the South did not apply to Congress; hence the United States had no constitutional authority to institute the so-called Civil War against the Southern States; what was birthed from the war was a system of law based on territorial principles. Accordingly, unknown to Americans all courts of the United States, state and federal, are being operated under principles of such law. One should note that, generally, all the courts in the [U]nited States of America have military flags in them (which are regular flags with gold fringe).

In essence, the states (governments) are acting in a quasi-de jure capacity and asserting their sovereignty over their citizens de facto. All voting Americans—or all United States citizens that have accepted this system by benefiting from it—have voluntarily been induced to unwittingly:

1) Become traitors to the de jure State;

2) Become residents of their states (hence, are not true citizens under the law of nations);

3) Accept a feudal system of law (and land ownership); thus,

4) Give up their natural right to sovereignty that is protected by the United States constitution (and by the law of nations).

IN CONCLUSION: Although the American governmental system is currently de facto, the de jure system of law, along with its several nationalities, is preserved. This is evident as nothing in the original Federal Constitution has been repealed; thus, it is still in full force and effect. Furthermore, under the rule of international law of servitus, the de facto governmental system cannot be forced on people of America that wish not to participate in it; thus, the de facto statutory construction can actually only be applied to consenting U.S. citizens; hence, is not mandatory for, thus cannot be forced on, those who wish not to rebel against their de jure law to partake in the insurgent governmental system.